Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2015 May 24;9:19-24. doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S21176. eCollection 2015.
Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer and Response to Treatment with Eribulin: A Case Series.
Breast cancer : basic and clinical research
Alex Y Chang, Xu Xiao Ying
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Singapore International Medical Centre, Johns Hopkins University, Singapore. ; Research Department, Johns Hopkins Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.
- Research Department, Johns Hopkins Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.
PMID: 26052228
PMCID: PMC4444132 DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S21176
Abstract
Brain metastases are common in patients with advanced breast cancer (BC), causing considerable morbidity and mortality. Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor approved for treating certain patients with metastatic BC, previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. In the 301 phase 3 study in 1102 women with advanced BC, eribulin and capecitabine treatments did not differ for co-primary endpoints (overall survival [OS]: 15.9 vs 14.5 months, P = 0.056; progression-free survival [PFS]: 4.1 vs 4.2 months, P = 0.30). Here, we report outcomes for six patients (eribulin, n = 3; capecitabine, n = 3) who had received treatment for brain metastases from BC (BCBM) at baseline. All eribulin-treated patients experienced brain lesion shrinkage at some point during treatment, compared with one capecitabine-treated patient. Fewer patients in study 301 developed new BCBM with eribulin (13/544, 2.4%) compared with capecitabine (25/546, 4.6%). Eribulin does not cross the healthy blood-brain barrier (BBB), but could have the potential to do so after cranial radiation therapy. Capecitabine may cross the BBB and has demonstrated activity in BCBM. Data from these patients and previous cases suggest that further investigation of eribulin for BCBM may be warranted.
Keywords: advanced breast cancer; brain metastases; capecitabine; case series; eribulin
References
- Xenobiotica. 2011 Apr;41(4):320-6 - PubMed
- Oncol Rep. 2002 Jul-Aug;9(4):683-8 - PubMed
- J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92 (3):205-16 - PubMed
- Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Jul;7(7):2003-11 - PubMed
- Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 15;15(4):1452-9 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2011 Mar 12;377(9769):914-23 - PubMed
- Cancer Invest. 2006 Jun-Jul;24(4):466-8 - PubMed
- Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Dec;19(6):1507-10 - PubMed
- BMC Res Notes. 2013 Dec 18;6:541 - PubMed
- Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 15;69(12):4951-3 - PubMed
- Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;13(6):1648-55 - PubMed
- Case Rep Oncol Med. 2012;2012:537183 - PubMed
- Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Dec;148(3):553-61 - PubMed
- Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013 Dec;30(8):951-6 - PubMed
- Oncologist. 2013 Jun;18(6):675-84 - PubMed
- Neuro Oncol. 2015 Feb;17(2):289-95 - PubMed
- Br J Cancer. 2007 Aug 6;97(3):322-6 - PubMed
- Oncologist. 2001;6(1):56-64 - PubMed
- J Neurooncol. 2007 Nov;85(2):223-7 - PubMed
- Clin Breast Cancer. 2006 Jun;7(2):164-6 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2954-61 - PubMed
- Biochemistry. 2010 Feb 16;49(6):1331-7 - PubMed
- Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011 Mar 15;21(6):1639-43 - PubMed
- Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):64-71 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):594-601 - PubMed
- Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Dec 15;22(24):7363-6 - PubMed
- Am J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug;24(4):421-4 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3922-8 - PubMed
- Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1348-54 - PubMed
Publication Types