Display options
Share it on

Curr Zool. 2015 Feb;61(1):70-84. doi: 10.1093/czoolo/61.1.70.

Detection of social group instability among captive rhesus macaques using joint network modeling.

Current zoology

Brianne A Beisner, Jian Jin, Hsieh Fushing, Brenda Mccowan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Population Health & Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA ; California National Primate Research Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  2. California National Primate Research Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  3. Department of Statistics, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

PMID: 26052339 PMCID: PMC4454484 DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/61.1.70

Abstract

Social stability in group-living animals is an emergent property which arises from the interaction amongst multiple behavioral networks. However, pinpointing when a social group is at risk of collapse is difficult. We used a joint network modeling approach to examine the interdependencies between two behavioral networks, aggression and status signaling, from four stable and three unstable groups of rhesus macaques in order to identify characteristic patterns of network interdependence in stable groups that are readily distinguishable from unstable groups. Our results showed that the most prominent source of aggression-status network interdependence in stable social groups came from more frequent dyads than expected with opposite direction status-aggression (i.e. A threatens B and B signals acceptance of subordinate status). In contrast, unstable groups showed a decrease in opposite direction aggression-status dyads (but remained higher than expected) as well as more frequent than expected dyads with bidirectional aggression. These results demonstrate that not only was the stable joint relationship between aggression and status networks readily distinguishable from unstable time points, social instability manifested in at least two different ways. In sum, our joint modeling approach may prove useful in quantifying and monitoring the complex social dynamics of any wild or captive social system, as all social systems are composed of multiple interconnected networks.

Keywords: Aggression; Dominance; Network stability; Nonhuman primates; Social network analysis; Status signaling

References

  1. PLoS Biol. 2004 Apr;2(4):E106 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 2007 Apr 5;446(7136):664-7 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2000 Jul 28;289(5479):586-90 - PubMed
  4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2108-18 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):426-9 - PubMed
  6. Int J Forecast. 2014 Jul-Sep;30(3):797-806 - PubMed
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1581-6 - PubMed
  8. Nature. 2011 Jan 20;469(7330):351-5 - PubMed
  9. Am J Primatol. 2011 Aug;73(8):790-801 - PubMed
  10. Primates. 1999 Jan;40(1):159-75 - PubMed
  11. Am J Primatol. 2014 Feb;76(2):111-21 - PubMed
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1091-9 - PubMed
  13. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2010 Mar;49(2):196-201 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82541 - PubMed
  15. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e51903 - PubMed
  16. J Anim Ecol. 2014 Mar;83(2):406-14 - PubMed
  17. PLoS One. 2011 Jan 26;6(1):e16365 - PubMed
  18. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012 Mar 1;137(3-4):137-147 - PubMed
  19. IET Syst Biol. 2009 Jul;3(4):219-28 - PubMed
  20. Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 19;87(21):219801 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support