Display options
Share it on

Redox Rep. 2016 Jan;21(1):14-23. doi: 10.1179/1351000215Y.0000000022. Epub 2016 Mar 04.

The effect of pentoxifylline on oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease patients with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness: Sub-study of the HERO trial.

Redox report : communications in free radical research

Lei Zhang, Jeff Coombes, Elaine M Pascoe, Sunil V Badve, Kim Dalziel, Alan Cass, Philip Clarke, Paolo Ferrari, Stephen P McDonald, Alicia T Morrish, Eugenie Pedagogos, Vlado Perkovic, Donna Reidlinger, Anish Scaria, Rowan Walker, Liza A Vergara, Carmel M Hawley, David W Johnson, On Behalf Of The Hero Study Collaborative Group

Affiliations

  1. a Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
  2. b Department of Nephrology , Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine , Guangzhou , China.
  3. c School of Human Movement Studies , University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
  4. d Department of Nephrology , Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane , Australia.
  5. e Center for Health Policy, Programs & Economics , University of Melbourne , Australia.
  6. f Menzies School of Health Research , Darwin , Australia.
  7. g Department of Renal Medicine , Fremantle Hospital , Australia.
  8. h Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Services , University of Adelaide at Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Services , Australia.
  9. i Department of Nephrology , Royal Melbourne Hospital , Australia.
  10. j George Institute , Sydney , Australia.
  11. k Department of Renal Medicine , The Alfred Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.
  12. l Translational Research Institute , Brisbane , Australia.

PMID: 26083328 PMCID: PMC6837737 DOI: 10.1179/1351000215Y.0000000022

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pentoxifylline has previously been shown to increase haemoglobin levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsive anaemia in the HERO multi-centre double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The present study evaluated the effects of pentoxifylline on oxidative stress in ESA-hyporesponsive CKD patients.

METHODS: This sub-study of the HERO trial compared 15 patients in the pentoxifylline arm (400 mg daily) and 17 in the matched placebo arm on oxidative stress markers: plasma total F2-isoprostanes, protein carbonyls, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities.

RESULTS: Pentoxifylline did not significantly alter total F2-isoprostanes (adjusted mean difference (MD) 35.01 pg/ml, P = 0.11), SOD activity (MD 0.82 U/ml, P = 0.07), GPX activity (MD -6.06 U/l, P = 0.09), or protein carbonyls (MD -0.04 nmol/mg, P = 0.52). Replicating results from the main study, pentoxifylline significantly increased haemoglobin concentration compared with controls (MD 7.2 g/l, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline did not alter oxidative stress biomarkers, suggesting that alternative mechanisms may be responsible for the agent's ability to augment haemoglobin levels in CKD patients with ESA-hyporesponsive anaemia.

Keywords: Anaemia; Chronic kidney disease; Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; Oxidative stress; Pentoxifylline

References

  1. Kidney Int. 2001 May;59(5):1960-6 - PubMed
  2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;19(3):593-9 - PubMed
  3. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464-78 - PubMed
  4. Blood. 2004 Jul 1;104(1):43-50 - PubMed
  5. BMC Nephrol. 2008 Aug 01;9:8 - PubMed
  6. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1146-55 - PubMed
  7. J Ren Nutr. 2007 Sep;17(5):296-304 - PubMed
  8. Anal Biochem. 1990 Feb 1;184(2):193-9 - PubMed
  9. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jan;65(1):49-57 - PubMed
  10. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Jan;113(1):3-10 - PubMed
  11. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Dec;54(6):1089-97 - PubMed
  12. Nephrology (Carlton). 2004 Aug;9(4):223-8 - PubMed
  13. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;101(4):336-44 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 02;9(1):e84943 - PubMed
  15. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17 Suppl 11:39-43 - PubMed
  16. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014 Mar;90:161-6 - PubMed
  17. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Sep;50(3):471-530 - PubMed
  18. ASAIO J. 2001 Sep-Oct;47(5):516-21 - PubMed
  19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Jul;15(7):1877-82 - PubMed
  20. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Nov;18 Suppl 8:viii17-22 - PubMed
  21. Acta Biochim Pol. 2006;53(4):663-77 - PubMed
  22. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Apr;45(2):495-501 - PubMed
  23. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Sep;20 Suppl 8:viii2-7 - PubMed
  24. Nephron Clin Pract. 2010;116(4):c294-9 - PubMed
  25. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1998 Jun;35(3):184-8 - PubMed
  26. Transplant Proc. 2007 Dec;39(10):3035-40 - PubMed
  27. Biomark Insights. 2008 May 27;3:419-428 - PubMed
  28. Clin Nephrol. 1999 Oct;52(4):239-45 - PubMed
  29. Kidney Int. 2004 Mar;65(3):1009-16 - PubMed
  30. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Jul;18(7):1272-80 - PubMed
  31. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2014 Jan;25(1):73-8 - PubMed
  32. Biochem Res Int. 2013;2013:358985 - PubMed

Publication Types