Display options
Share it on

Analyst. 2015 Jul 21;140(14):4887-94. doi: 10.1039/c5an00343a. Epub 2015 May 20.

Topological events in single molecules of E. coli DNA confined in nanochannels.

The Analyst

Jeffrey G Reifenberger, Kevin D Dorfman, Han Cao

Affiliations

  1. BioNano Genomics, 9640 Towne Centre Drive, Ste 100, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 25991508 PMCID: PMC4486629 DOI: 10.1039/c5an00343a

Abstract

We present experimental data concerning potential topological events such as folds, internal backfolds, and/or knots within long molecules of double-stranded DNA when they are stretched by confinement in a nanochannel. Genomic DNA from E. coli was labeled near the 'GCTCTTC' sequence with a fluorescently labeled dUTP analog and stained with the DNA intercalator YOYO. Individual long molecules of DNA were then linearized and imaged using methods based on the NanoChannel Array technology (Irys® System) available from BioNano Genomics. Data were collected on 189 153 molecules of length greater than 50 kilobases. A custom code was developed to search for abnormal intensity spikes in the YOYO backbone profile along the length of individual molecules. By correlating the YOYO intensity spikes with the aligned barcode pattern to the reference, we were able to correlate the bright intensity regions of YOYO with abnormal stretching in the molecule, which suggests these events were either a knot or a region of internal backfolding within the DNA. We interpret the results of our experiments involving molecules exceeding 50 kilobases in the context of existing simulation data for relatively short DNA, typically several kilobases. The frequency of these events is lower than the predictions from simulations, while the size of the events is larger than simulation predictions and often exceeds the molecular weight of the simulated molecules. We also identified DNA molecules that exhibit large, single folds as they enter the nanochannels. Overall, topological events occur at a low frequency (∼7% of all molecules) and pose an easily surmountable obstacle for the practice of genome mapping in nanochannels.

References

  1. Macromolecules. 2011 Aug 23;44(16):6594-6604 - PubMed
  2. Analyst. 2013 Feb 21;138(4):1249-55 - PubMed
  3. Biopolymers. 1977 Jul;16(7):1435-48 - PubMed
  4. Nano Lett. 2008 Jun;8(6):1683-8 - PubMed
  5. Cell. 2010 Nov 24;143(5):837-47 - PubMed
  6. Rep Prog Phys. 2012 Oct;75(10):106601 - PubMed
  7. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Sep;42(15):e118 - PubMed
  8. Langmuir. 2005 Apr 26;21(9):4144-8 - PubMed
  9. Nano Lett. 2008 Nov;8(11):3839-44 - PubMed
  10. Biophys J. 2002 May;82(5):2775-83 - PubMed
  11. Phys Rev Lett. 2013 May 17;110(20):208103 - PubMed
  12. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Jun;77(6 Pt 1):060901 - PubMed
  13. Gigascience. 2014 Dec 30;3(1):34 - PubMed
  14. Nat Rev Genet. 2004 May;5(5):345-54 - PubMed
  15. J Chem Phys. 2015 Feb 14;142(6):064902 - PubMed
  16. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Oct;41(19):e184 - PubMed
  17. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Oct;38(18):e177 - PubMed
  18. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010 Oct;Chapter 14:Unit14.20 - PubMed
  19. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:387 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2673-8 - PubMed
  21. Biophys J. 2006 Jun 15;90(12):4538-45 - PubMed
  22. J Chem Phys. 2014 Feb 28;140(8):084905 - PubMed
  23. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Aug;30(8):771-6 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):198-203 - PubMed
  25. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Dec;90(6):062602 - PubMed
  26. Science. 2003 Jun 27;300(5628):2061-5 - PubMed
  27. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55864 - PubMed
  28. Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):59-65 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support