Display options
Share it on

BMC Nurs. 2015 May 14;14:33. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0082-x. eCollection 2015.

The influences of nursing transformational leadership style on the quality of nurses' working lives in Taiwan: a cross-sectional quantitative study.

BMC nursing

Ping-Yi Lin, Sara MacLennan, Nigel Hunt, Tom Cox, White

Affiliations

  1. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Crescent, Wollaton Road, NG8 1BB Nottingham, UK ; Transplant Medicine & Surgery Research Centre, Changhua Christian Hospital, No.135, Nansiao St., Changhua city, Changhua county 50006 Taiwan.
  2. Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, oresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Scotland UK.
  3. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Crescent, Wollaton Road, NG8 1BB Nottingham, UK.
  4. Centre for Sustainable Working Life, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, Bloomsbury, London, England WC1E 7HX United Kingdom.

PMID: 25991910 PMCID: PMC4437742 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-015-0082-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Taiwan's NHI system is one of the most successful health care models for countries around the globe. However, little research has demonstrated the mental health issues associated with nursing transformational leadership style under the NHI system, especially in the quality of nurses' working lives in Taiwan. It is important to know the relationship between transformational leadership style and the mental health of nurses, organisational commitment and job satisfaction. The research aimed to understand the influences of nursing transformational leadership style on the quality of nurses' working lives in Taiwan. The research hypothesis was that transformational leadership styles would have positive influence on the quality of nurses' working lives.

METHODS: This was a cross-sectional quantitative study. Nurses from each type of hospital ownership (private, public and religious) were recruited. Participation was voluntary and signed informed consent was obtained. The inclusion criteria were nurses with at least one year's work experience in the hospitals. Self-administrated questionnaires were used. A total of 807 participants were contacted and 651 questionnaires were fully completed (response rate 80.7 %). A theory driven model was used to test the research hypotheses using structural equation modelling performed with AMOS 16.0.

RESULTS: Transformational leadership contributes significantly to supervisor support. Workplace support, particularly from the supervisor, is an important mediator variable that explains the relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Organisational commitment was the strongest factor relevant to the general health well-being in Taiwanese nurses than job satisfaction. The hypothesized positive relationships between transformational leadership and all variables were supported by the data.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings have important consequences for organisational health. Our model demonstrates a complete picture of the work relationships on the quality of nurses' working lives. The results provided information about the subordinates' perceptions of transformational nursing leadership styles and mental health outcomes in different hospital settings, as well as identified organisational factors that could improve the quality of nurses' working lives.

Keywords: Job satisfaction; Organisational commitment; Quality of working life; Transformational leadership

References

  1. J Nurs Educ. 2006 Oct;45(10):404-11 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Nov;18(22):3172-80 - PubMed
  3. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Sep;63(5):465-75 - PubMed
  4. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Jul;14(5):348-55 - PubMed
  5. J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(11-12):1645-53 - PubMed
  6. J Nurs Manag. 2011 May;19(4):487-97 - PubMed
  7. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Nov;14(8):610-6 - PubMed
  8. Psychol Med. 1990 Nov;20(4):931-40 - PubMed
  9. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(1):40-54 - PubMed
  10. Nurs Res. 1993 Jan-Feb;42(1):36-41 - PubMed
  11. Nurs Adm Q. 2009 Oct-Dec;33(4):301-9 - PubMed
  12. Nurs Manage. 1995 Sep;26(9):64JJ-64LL, 64NN - PubMed
  13. J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):65-73 - PubMed
  14. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Sep;46(9):1236-44 - PubMed
  15. Appl Nurs Res. 2009 Nov;22(4):258-63 - PubMed
  16. Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(4):242-8 - PubMed
  17. J Adv Nurs. 2000 Apr;31(4):857-64 - PubMed
  18. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322-55 - PubMed
  19. Int Nurs Rev. 2005 Dec;52(4):253-62 - PubMed
  20. Nurs Stand. 2010 Jun 9-15;24(40):35-40 - PubMed
  21. Ind Health. 2011;49(2):158-65 - PubMed
  22. Australas Med J. 2012;5(1):1-7 - PubMed
  23. J Occup Health Psychol. 2004 Apr;9(2):165-75 - PubMed
  24. Gerontologist. 2009 Apr;49(2):166-74 - PubMed
  25. Nurs Adm Q. 2010 Jul-Sep;34(3):246-58 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 - PubMed
  27. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Sep;65(9):1833-43 - PubMed
  28. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Dec;44(6):633-42 - PubMed
  29. J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Feb;51(2):195-203 - PubMed
  30. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 May;41(4):437-46 - PubMed
  31. Contemp Nurse. 2004 Oct;17(3):293-304 - PubMed
  32. J Nurs Manag. 2007 Jul;15(5):508-21 - PubMed
  33. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Feb;68(2):444-51 - PubMed
  34. J Nurs Adm. 2003 May;33(5):271-83 - PubMed
  35. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2007 Jul-Sep;26(3):234-9 - PubMed
  36. Nurs Health Sci. 2001 Sep;3(3):161-72 - PubMed
  37. J Nurs Manag. 2010 May;18(4):425-39 - PubMed
  38. J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;34(5):403-9 - PubMed
  39. AORN J. 2009 May;89(5):851-60 - PubMed
  40. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jul-Aug;28(4):w657-68 - PubMed
  41. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006;38(1):71-9 - PubMed
  42. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1357-67 - PubMed

Publication Types