Display options
Share it on

Front Physiol. 2015 May 12;6:142. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00142. eCollection 2015.

Using local scale exponent to characterize heart rate variability in response to postural changes in people with spinal cord injury.

Frontiers in physiology

Fuyuan Liao, Ben-Yi Liau, Ian M Rice, Jeannette Elliott, Ian Brooks, Yih-Kuen Jan

Affiliations

  1. Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL, USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Xi'an Technological University Xi'an, China.
  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hungkuang University Taichung, Taiwan.
  3. Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL, USA.
  4. Division of Disability Resources and Educational Services, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL, USA.
  5. National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL, USA.

PMID: 26029112 PMCID: PMC4428216 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00142

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) is a promising marker for evaluating the remaining autonomic function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). HRV is commonly assessed by spectral analysis and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). This study aimed to investigate whether local scale exponent α(t) can reveal new features of HRV that cannot be reflected by spectral measures and DFA coefficients. We studied 12 participants with SCI and 15 healthy able-bodied controls. ECG signals were continually recorded during 10 min sitting and 10 min prone postures. α(t) was calculated for scales between 4 and 60 s. Because α(t) could be overestimated at small scales, we developed an approach for correcting α(t) based on previous studies. The simulation results on simulated monofractal time series with α between 0.5 and 1.3 showed that the proposed method can yield improved estimation of α(t). We applied the proposed method to raw RR interval series. The results showed that α(t) in healthy controls monotonically decreased with scale at scales between 4 and 12 s (0.083-0.25 Hz) in both the sitting and prone postures, whereas in participants with SCI, α(t) slowly decreased at almost all scales. The sharp decreasing trend in α(t) in controls suggests a more complex dynamics of HRV in controls. α(t) at scales between 4 (0.25 Hz) and around 7 s (0.143 Hz) was lower in subjects with SCI than in controls in the sitting posture; α(t) at a narrow range of scales around 12 s (0.083 Hz) was higher in participants with SCI than in controls in the prone posture. However, none of normalized low frequency (0.04-0.15 Hz) power, the ratio of low frequency power to high frequency (0.15-0.4 Hz) power and long-term (>11 beats) DFA coefficient showed significant difference between healthy controls and subjects with SCI in the prone posture. Our results suggest that α(t) can reveal more detailed information in comparison to spectral measures and the standard DFA parameters.

Keywords: complexity; heart rate variability; local scale exponent; spinal cord injury

References

  1. Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17(3):354-81 - PubMed
  2. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jun;290(6):H2560-70 - PubMed
  3. Circulation. 2005 Jul 19;112(3):314-9 - PubMed
  4. Chaos. 2003 Jun;13(2):467-75 - PubMed
  5. Physiol Meas. 2002 May;23(2):385-401 - PubMed
  6. Clin Auton Res. 2006 Dec;16(6):378-83 - PubMed
  7. Biophys J. 2007 May 15;92(10):3734-52 - PubMed
  8. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(2):203-14 - PubMed
  9. Spinal Cord. 2009 Jan;47(1):36-43 - PubMed
  10. Physiol Meas. 2002 May;23(2):325-36 - PubMed
  11. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013 Fall;19(4):267-78 - PubMed
  12. J Physiol. 2011 Jan 15;589(Pt 2):355-69 - PubMed
  13. Neurobiol Aging. 2002 Jan-Feb;23(1):23-6 - PubMed
  14. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Jan;53(1):43-52 - PubMed
  15. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001 Mar;280(3):H1081-7 - PubMed
  16. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009 Mar;56(3):675-84 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):461-5 - PubMed
  18. Physiol Meas. 2006 Feb;27(2):145-54 - PubMed
  19. J Neurotrauma. 2006 Dec;23(12):1713-25 - PubMed
  20. Physiol Meas. 2007 Jun;28(6):721-30 - PubMed
  21. J Physiol. 2009 Aug 1;587(Pt 15):3929-41 - PubMed
  22. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Feb;294(2):H668-78 - PubMed
  23. Prog Brain Res. 2006;152:223-9 - PubMed
  24. Chaos. 1995;5(1):82-7 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 Jan;158(1):85-90 - PubMed
  26. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1997 Jan;55(1):845-9 - PubMed
  27. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1999 Nov;60(3):197-213 - PubMed
  28. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Apr 13;367(1892):1223-38 - PubMed

Publication Types