Display options
Share it on

Pol J Radiol. 2015 May 13;80:252-8. doi: 10.12659/PJR.893793. eCollection 2015.

Comparison of multidetector computed tomography findings with clinical and laboratory data in pulmonary thromboembolism.

Polish journal of radiology

Zuhal Gülşen, Pınar Nercis Koşar, Fatma Dilek Gökharman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, K?z?ltepe State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.
  2. Department of Radiology, Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

PMID: 26029288 PMCID: PMC4434981 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.893793

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a common disease with a high mortality rate that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Because of the variety of clinical symptoms and signs, it is difficult to diagnose. Therefore, the diagnosis of PTE is mainly confirmed by imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is any corelation of the Wells rule, D-dimer and LDH values with computerized tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) findings in PTE diagnosis.

MATERIAL/METHODS: A consecutive series of 62 patients, which included 31 males and 31 females, with high/moderate/low risk of embolism according to Wells pulmonary embolism score, selected from the emergency service and/or outpatient clinic, enrolled in this prospective study. The patients with clinical or laboratory findings of elevated D-dimer level or elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level were suspected of embolism and underwent tomography.

RESULTS: PTE was detected in 26 patients (42%). A significant difference was not detected between tomography finding positive and negative embolisms in the patient group in terms of age or gender distribution (P=0.221 and P=0.416, respectively). No significant difference was detected between tomography finding positive and negative embolisms in the patient group in terms of elevated LDH or/and D-dimer levels (P=0.263 and P=1.000, respectively). The distribution of low-risk-factor patients in the non-embolism group, and the distribution of high-risk-factor patients in the embolism-positive group was statistically significantly high (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P=0.053). Correlation test showed no correlation between LDH and D-dimer levels. (r=0.214, P=0.180).

CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when a patient presents with chest pain, our carrying out LDH and D-Dimer tests will not exclude PTE without CTPA. However, we suggest that LDH isoenzymes should be studied in further research.

Keywords: Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Lactate Dehydrogenases; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Pulmonary Embolism

References

  1. Radiology. 1999 Apr;211(1):147-53 - PubMed
  2. Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1440-56 - PubMed
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;17(2):133-41 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Invest. 1971 Mar;50(3):474-80 - PubMed
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Apr 20;140(8):589-602 - PubMed
  6. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008 Dec;14 (4):189-96 - PubMed
  7. Tuberk Toraks. 2005;53(3):252-8 - PubMed
  8. J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Sep;1(9):1888-96 - PubMed
  9. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 17;138(12 ):941-51 - PubMed
  10. Chest. 2002 Mar;121(3):877-905 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care Med. 2000 Feb;28(2):414-20 - PubMed
  12. Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):978-81 - PubMed
  13. Radiographics. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):1219-38 - PubMed
  14. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005 Nov-Dec;29(6):805-14 - PubMed
  15. J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;7(10):1633-8 - PubMed
  16. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014 Nov;18(22):3517-20 - PubMed
  17. Am J Med. 2004 Mar 1;116(5):291-9 - PubMed
  18. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):407-11 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 1991 Mar 23;302(6778):709-11 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 1986 Apr 18;255(15):2039-42 - PubMed
  21. Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1914-20 - PubMed
  22. J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Jun;5(6):798-803 - PubMed
  23. J Investig Med. 2014 Feb;62(2):328-31 - PubMed
  24. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):492-6 - PubMed
  25. Thromb Haemost. 2009 May;101(5):886-92 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2014 Mar 19;311(11):1117-24 - PubMed
  27. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):1178; author reply 1178-9 - PubMed

Publication Types