Display options
Cite
Sarkar U, Simchowitz B, Bonacum D, et al. A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(10):461-1doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x.
Sarkar, U., Simchowitz, B., Bonacum, D., Strull, W., Lopez, A., Rotteau, L., & Shojania, K. G. (2014). A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 40(10), 461-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x
Sarkar, Urmimala, et al. "A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors." Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety vol. 40,10 (2014): 461-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x
Sarkar U, Simchowitz B, Bonacum D, Strull W, Lopez A, Rotteau L, Shojania KG. A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Oct;40(10):461-1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x. PMID: 26111306.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Oct;40(10):461-1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x.

A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Perspectives on Missed and Delayed Outpatient Diagnosis: The Focus on System-Related Factors.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety

Urmimala Sarkar, Brett Simchowitz, Doug Bonacum, William Strull, Andrea Lopez, Leahora Rotteau, Kaveh G Shojania

Affiliations

  1. Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

PMID: 26111306 DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed and missed diagnoses lead to significant patient harm. Because physician actions are fundamental to the outpatient diagnostic process, a study was conducted to explore physician perspectives on diagnosis.

METHODS: As part of a quality improvement initiative, an integrated health system conducted six physician focus groups in 2004 and 2005. The focus groups included questions about the process of diagnosis, specific factors contributing to missed diagnosis, use of guidelines, atypical vs. typical presentations of disease, diagnostic tools, and follow-up, all with regard to delays in the diagnostic process. The interviews were analyzed (1) deductively, with application of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, which addresses systems design, quality management, job design, and technology implementations that affect safety-related patient and organizational and/or staff outcomes, and (2) inductively, with identification of novel themes using content analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 25 physicians participated in the six focus groups, which yielded 12 hours of discussion. Providers identified multiple barriers to timely and accurate diagnosis, including organizational culture, information availability, and communication factors.

CONCLUSIONS: Multiple themes relating to each of the participants in the diagnostic process-health system, provider, and patient-emerged. Concerns about health system structure and providers' interactions with one another and with patients far exceeded discussion of the cognitive factors that might affect the diagnostic process. The results suggest that, at least in physicians' views, improving the diagnostic process requires attention to the organization of the health system in addition to the cognitive aspects of diagnosis.

Publication Types