Display options
Share it on

J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:642624. doi: 10.1155/2015/642624. Epub 2015 May 31.

Evaluation of Idiopathic Choroidal Neovascularization with Indocyanine Green Angiography in Patients Undergoing Bevacizumab Therapy.

Journal of ophthalmology

Ryan B Rush, Sloan W Rush

Affiliations

  1. Southwest Retina Specialists, 7411 Wallace Boulevard, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA ; Panhandle Eye Group, 7400 Fleming Avenue, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA ; Texas Tech University Health Science Center, 1400 S. Coulter, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA.
  2. Panhandle Eye Group, 7400 Fleming Avenue, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA ; Texas Tech University Health Science Center, 1400 S. Coulter, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA.

PMID: 26113990 PMCID: PMC4465762 DOI: 10.1155/2015/642624

Abstract

Purpose. To examine the clinical implications of change in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) size on indocyanine green (ICG) angiography in subjects with idiopathic CNV undergoing bevacizumab therapy. Methods. The charts of subjects with an idiopathic CNV treated by a modified PRN regimen with intravitreal bevacizumab over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Results. There were 34 subjects included in the analysis. Baseline CNV sizes of less than 1.0 mm(2) on ICG angiography correlated with complete CNV resolution (P = 0.0404), fewer injections delivered (P = 0.0002), and better Snellen visual acuity (P = 0.0098) at 12 months. Subjects that experienced a 33% or more reduction in CNV size on ICG angiography at 2 months had complete CNV resolution (P = 0.0047) and fewer injections (P < 0.0001) at 12 months compared to subjects that did not experience a 33% or more reduction in CNV size on ICG angiography at 2 months. Conclusions. Smaller baseline CNV size on ICG angiography resulted in better visual acuity and fewer injections at 12 months, and a reduction of 33% or more in CNV size after 2 months may predict a better clinical course in subjects with idiopathic CNV undergoing bevacizumab therapy.

References

  1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;158(2):337-44 - PubMed
  2. Eye (Lond). 2012 Jul;26(7):1004-11 - PubMed
  3. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;125(11):1487-92 - PubMed
  4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;153(2):300-306.e1 - PubMed
  5. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;4(2):67-74 - PubMed
  6. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;45(4):381-5 - PubMed
  7. Retina. 2010 May;30(5):733-8 - PubMed
  8. Ophthalmology. 2000 Aug;107(8):1601-6 - PubMed
  9. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;156(6):1201-1210.e2 - PubMed
  10. Ophthalmology. 1996 Dec;103(12):2054-60 - PubMed
  11. Retina. 2014 Aug;34(8):1531-8 - PubMed
  12. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):1-18 - PubMed
  13. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;143(6):977-983 - PubMed
  14. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;96(8):1068-72 - PubMed
  15. Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1411-2 - PubMed
  16. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):225-33 - PubMed
  17. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Jun;108(6):832-7 - PubMed
  18. Ophthalmology. 1995 May;102(5):782-9 - PubMed
  19. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;143(3):507-10 - PubMed
  20. Retina. 2012 Apr;32(4):687-95 - PubMed
  21. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;155(4):713-9, 719.e1 - PubMed
  22. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;5(5):251-6 - PubMed

Publication Types