Display options
Share it on

Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Jun;4(3):128-35. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0189-5.

Stressors and starting points for health-promoting interventions in medical school from the students' perspective: a qualitative study.

Perspectives on medical education

Thomas Kötter, Nadine J Pohontsch, Edgar Voltmer

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23552, Lübeck, Germany, [email protected].

PMID: 26032519 PMCID: PMC4456465 DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0189-5

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical education is considered very challenging and connected with high levels of psychosocial stress for students. The aim of this study was to identify stressors and possible starting points for health-promoting interventions from the perspective of the students themselves.

METHODS: We conducted two focus groups with medical students from pre-clinical and clinical semesters. We analyzed the data using content analysis following Mayring's approach.

RESULTS: The stressors in the pre-clinical stage of medical education were more diverse and perceived as more intense than those in the clinical stage. They comprised contextual factors and individual behaviour. Participants mentioned the weekly examinations as a specific stressor. The existing absence regulations gave the participants the impression that they should not be absent through illness at any point during the course, and this idea further promoted presenteeism. Peer groups and mentoring programmes were perceived as helpful.

CONCLUSIONS: Stressors and starting points for health-promoting interventions are closely related to the medical curriculum and its organization. As such, the curriculum itself-in addition to programmes aimed at improving stress management-should primarily stand at the centre of activities for enhancing students' health.

References

  1. Med Educ. 2004 May;38(5):504-9 - PubMed
  2. Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):489-92 - PubMed
  3. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(1):Doc12 - PubMed
  4. Health Promot Int. 2001 Jun;16(2):145-54 - PubMed
  5. Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1367-73 - PubMed
  6. Med Educ. 2002 Mar;36(3):233-40 - PubMed
  7. Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):103-10 - PubMed
  8. Acad Med. 1999 Jan;74(1 Suppl):S53-8 - PubMed
  9. Teach Learn Med. 2007 Winter;19(1):42-6 - PubMed
  10. J Cancer Educ. 1987;2(2):107-11 - PubMed
  11. Acad Med. 2001 Apr;76(4 Suppl):S68-71 - PubMed
  12. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(2):116-24 - PubMed
  13. J R Soc Med. 1998 May;91(5):237-43 - PubMed
  14. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1245-50 - PubMed
  15. Acad Psychiatry. 2013 May 1;37(3):158-64 - PubMed
  16. Acad Med. 1997 Aug;72(8):708-14 - PubMed
  17. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1107-8 - PubMed
  18. Med Educ. 2000 Nov;34(11):897-902 - PubMed
  19. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):840-7 - PubMed
  20. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov;25(11):1244-7 - PubMed
  21. BMC Med Educ. 2006 Sep 19;6:48 - PubMed
  22. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Mar 16;10:23 - PubMed

Publication Types