Display options
Share it on

Auto Immun Highlights. 2010 Nov 04;1(2):83-6. doi: 10.1007/s13317-010-0012-6. eCollection 2010 Nov.

Diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies assessed in a population-based, cross-sectional study in adults.

Auto- immunity highlights

Emanuele Bosi, Roberto Bianchi, Giacomo Ruotolo, Elena Bazzigaluppi, Cristina Belloni, Giliola Calori, Anna Maria Girardi, Maria Paola Garancini, Marina Scavini

Affiliations

  1. General Medicine, Diabetes & Endocrinology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy ; Autoimmunity Unit, Laboraf, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  2. General Medicine, Diabetes & Endocrinology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
  3. Epidemiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  4. Autoimmunity Unit, Laboraf, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
  5. Medical Direction, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

PMID: 26000111 PMCID: PMC4389046 DOI: 10.1007/s13317-010-0012-6

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity of thyroid autoantibodies in individuals with a case-mix of subjects with thyroid disease representing that of the general population. We measured thyroid microsome (TMA), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), thyroglobulin (TGA) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TRA) autoantibodies in subjects in the bottom (hyperthyroid end) and top (hypothyroid end) four percentiles of the TSH distribution from among participants in a population-based survey of individuals aged ≥40 years (the Cremona Study). TMA and TPO were the most sensitive autoantibodies in subjects in both the bottom percentiles (19.8% and 18.5%, respectively) and the top percentiles (51.2% and 53.8%, respectively) of the TSH distribution. TMA and TPO showed good agreement (kappa statistics 87.8%, 95% CI 80.1-95.5%) at both ends of the TSH distribution. TGA were the next most sensitive marker, although seldom detected if TMA or TPO were not present. TRA were detected only at the extremes of the TSH distribution (1st percentile, 31.8%; 100th percentile, 25.0%). We conclude that, among a case-mix of individuals with thyroid disease representing that of the general population, TMA and TPO are the most sensitive markers of thyroid disease. TGA only marginally increased the diagnostic sensitivity of TMA and TPO. TRA are sensitive markers of thyroid disease only at the extremes of thyroid function.

Keywords: Autoantibody screening; Autoimmune thyroid disease; Population-based studies; Thyroid autoantibodies; Thyroid disease

References

  1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Nov;61(5):1001-3 - PubMed
  2. Diabetologia. 1995 Mar;38(3):306-13 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000 Nov;143(5):639-47 - PubMed
  4. Thyroid. 1998 Dec;8(12):1179-83 - PubMed
  5. FEBS Lett. 1985 Oct 7;190(1):147-52 - PubMed
  6. Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74 - PubMed
  7. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006 Jan;64(1):97-104 - PubMed
  8. Ann Clin Biochem. 2006 May;43(Pt 3):173-83 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Mar;83(3):765-9 - PubMed
  10. Clin Chem. 2006 Jan;52(1):104-11 - PubMed
  11. Epidemiology. 1996 Sep;7(5):561 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Feb;87(2):489-99 - PubMed
  13. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995 Jul;43(1):55-68 - PubMed
  14. Lancet. 2003 Apr 5;361(9364):1226 - PubMed
  15. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005 Jun;62(6):713-20 - PubMed

Publication Types