Display options
Share it on

Ochsner J. 2015;15(2):133-42.

A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Clonidine vs Bupivacaine for Pain Control During and After Lower Abdominal Surgery.

The Ochsner journal

Alaa A Abd-Elsayed, Maged Guirguis, Mark S DeWood, Sherif S Zaky

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
  3. College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
  4. Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

PMID: 26130975 PMCID: PMC4482554

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists produce safe and effective analgesia, but most investigations studying the analgesic effect of alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists postoperatively included previous or concomitant administration of other analgesics. Because clonidine potentiates the effect of these drugs, its own intrinsic analgesic effect has been difficult to establish. This study was designed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative effects of epidural clonidine vs bupivacaine for patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

METHODS: This randomized controlled trial included 40 patients aged 18-50 who were scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I (n=20) received epidural clonidine; Group II (n=20) received epidural bupivacaine. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, pain scores, and complications were monitored.

RESULTS: Mean pain scores were significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II (1.5 ± 0.5 compared to 3.4 ± 1.0, respectively) in the first 12 hours after surgery. Sedation was more prominent in Group I until 9 hours after surgery. Opioid requirements were significantly lower in Group I. Respiratory rate was similar in the 2 groups. Group I had larger decreases from baseline in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure than Group II. Heart rate in Group I was reduced from baseline, while it was increased in Group II. Less postoperative nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, and shivering were observed in Group I.

CONCLUSION: Compared to bupivacaine, epidural clonidine provided effective intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in selected patients, resulting in a decreased intravenous pain medication requirement and prolonged duration of analgesia after epidural infusion was discontinued.

Keywords: Adrenergic alpha-agonists; analgesia–epidural; bupivacaine; clonidine; intraoperative care; pain–postoperative

References

  1. Anaesthesia. 1990 Jul;45(7):531-4 - PubMed
  2. Anesth Analg. 1995 Feb;80(2):322-7 - PubMed
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7 - PubMed
  4. Anesth Analg. 1995 May;80(5):869-74 - PubMed
  5. Anesthesiology. 1989 Sep;71(3):418-25 - PubMed
  6. Anesth Analg. 1986 Dec;65(12):1303-11 - PubMed
  7. Anesth Analg. 1995 Oct;81(4):706-12 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 1984 Oct 13;2(8407):876 - PubMed
  9. Anesthesiology. 1992 Sep;77(3):457-62 - PubMed
  10. Anesth Analg. 1995 Dec;81(6):1154-62 - PubMed
  11. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):179-83 - PubMed
  12. Pain. 1990 Nov;43(2):149-54 - PubMed
  13. Anesth Analg. 1992 Oct;75(4):607-10 - PubMed
  14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Feb;160(2):471-6 - PubMed
  15. Pain. 1987 Jan;28(1):129-38 - PubMed
  16. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):948-52 - PubMed
  17. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):54-61 - PubMed
  18. Pain. 1995 Jun;61(3):391-9 - PubMed
  19. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Apr;68(4):338-43 - PubMed
  20. Anesthesiology. 1991 Sep;75(3):420-5 - PubMed
  21. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Jun;213(3):525-33 - PubMed
  22. Reg Anesth. 1993 May-Jun;18(3):176-80 - PubMed
  23. Neurosci Lett. 1992 May 11;139(1):65-8 - PubMed
  24. Br J Anaesth. 1990 Aug;65(2):157-63 - PubMed
  25. Anesthesiology. 1989 Jan;70(1):51-6 - PubMed
  26. Anesth Analg. 1986 Dec;65(12):1312-8 - PubMed
  27. Anesthesiology. 1987 Apr;66(4):496-501 - PubMed
  28. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Oct;63(4):465-9 - PubMed
  29. Anaesthesia. 1994 Nov;49(11):999-1002 - PubMed
  30. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jan;86(1):102-6 - PubMed
  31. Anesthesiology. 1999 May;90(5):1354-62 - PubMed
  32. Anesth Analg. 1991 Jun;72(6):761-4 - PubMed
  33. Anesthesiology. 1994 Sep;81(3):677-88 - PubMed
  34. Anesthesiology. 1984 Apr;60(4):269-75 - PubMed
  35. Acta Cardiol. 1983;38(3):233-6 - PubMed
  36. Anesthesiology. 1992 Aug;77(2):267-74 - PubMed
  37. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Feb;68(2):132-5 - PubMed
  38. Anesthesiology. 1996 Sep;85(3):655-74 - PubMed
  39. Anesth Analg. 1994 Aug;79(2):285-90 - PubMed
  40. Br Med J. 1974 Jun 22;2(5920):656-9 - PubMed
  41. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988 Nov;32(8):702-9 - PubMed
  42. Anesthesiology. 1994 Sep;81(3):591-601; discussion 27A-28A - PubMed
  43. Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1179-85 - PubMed
  44. Anesthesiology. 1993 Sep;79(3):525-31 - PubMed
  45. Trends Neurosci. 1995 Dec;18(12):549-53 - PubMed
  46. Anesthesiology. 1989 Nov;71(5):647-52 - PubMed
  47. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jul;83(1):33-47 - PubMed
  48. Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1067-73 - PubMed
  49. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994 Oct;23(3):319-35 - PubMed
  50. Anesthesiology. 1981 Jun;54(6):451-67 - PubMed
  51. Anesthesiology. 1993 Feb;78(2):277-87 - PubMed

Publication Types