Display options
Cite
Romeo FV, Ballistreri G, Fabroni S, et al. Chemical Characterization of Different Sumac and Pomegranate Extracts Effective against Botrytis cinerea Rots. Molecules. 2015;20(7):11941-58doi: 10.3390/molecules200711941.
Romeo, F. V., Ballistreri, G., Fabroni, S., Pangallo, S., Nicosia, M. G., Schena, L., & Rapisarda, P. (2015). Chemical Characterization of Different Sumac and Pomegranate Extracts Effective against Botrytis cinerea Rots. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 20(7), 11941-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200711941
Romeo, Flora V, et al. "Chemical Characterization of Different Sumac and Pomegranate Extracts Effective against Botrytis cinerea Rots." Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) vol. 20,7 (2015): 11941-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules200711941
Romeo FV, Ballistreri G, Fabroni S, Pangallo S, Nicosia MG, Schena L, Rapisarda P. Chemical Characterization of Different Sumac and Pomegranate Extracts Effective against Botrytis cinerea Rots. Molecules. 2015 Jun 30;20(7):11941-58. doi: 10.3390/molecules200711941. PMID: 26133760; PMCID: PMC6331891.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Molecules. 2015 Jun 30;20(7):11941-58. doi: 10.3390/molecules200711941.

Chemical Characterization of Different Sumac and Pomegranate Extracts Effective against Botrytis cinerea Rots.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)

Flora V Romeo, Gabriele Ballistreri, Simona Fabroni, Sonia Pangallo, Maria Giulia Li Destri Nicosia, Leonardo Schena, Paolo Rapisarda

Affiliations

  1. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CRA)-Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrumicoltura e le Colture Mediterranee (CRA-ACM), Corso Savoia 190, Acireale (CT) 95024, Italy. [email protected].
  2. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CRA)-Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrumicoltura e le Colture Mediterranee (CRA-ACM), Corso Savoia 190, Acireale (CT) 95024, Italy. [email protected].
  3. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CRA)-Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrumicoltura e le Colture Mediterranee (CRA-ACM), Corso Savoia 190, Acireale (CT) 95024, Italy. [email protected].
  4. Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria 89122, Italy. [email protected].
  5. Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria 89122, Italy. [email protected].
  6. Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria 89122, Italy. [email protected].
  7. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CRA)-Centro di Ricerca per l'Agrumicoltura e le Colture Mediterranee (CRA-ACM), Corso Savoia 190, Acireale (CT) 95024, Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 26133760 PMCID: PMC6331891 DOI: 10.3390/molecules200711941

Abstract

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel and sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruit and leaf extracts were chemically characterized and their ability to inhibit table grape (cv. Italia) rots caused by Botrytis cinerea was evaluated on artificially inoculated berries. Different extraction methods were applied and extracts were characterized through Ultra Fast High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Photodiode array detector and Electrospray ionization Mass spectrometer (UPLC-PDA-ESI/MSn) for their phenol and anthocyanin contents. The concentrated pomegranate peel extract (PGE-C) was the richest in phenols (66.97 g gallic acid equivalents/kg) while the concentrated sumac extract from fruits (SUF-C) showed the highest anthocyanin amount (171.96 mg cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalents/kg). Both phenolic and anthocyanin profile of pomegranate and sumac extracts were quite different: pomegranate extract was rich in cyanidin 3-glucoside, pelargonidin 3-glucoside and ellagic acid derivatives, while sumac extract was characterized by 7-methyl-cyanidin 3-galactoside and gallic acid derivatives. The concentrated extracts from both pomegranate peel and sumac leaves significantly reduced the development of Botrytis rots. In particular, the extract from pomegranate peel completely inhibited the pathogen at different intervals of time (0, 12, and 24 h) between treatment and pathogen inoculation on fruits maintained at 22-24 °C and high relative humidity (RH). This extract may represent a valuable alternative to control postharvest fungal rots in view of its high efficacy because of the low cost of pomegranate peel, which is a waste product of processing factories.

Keywords: Punica granatum; Rhus coriaria; UPLC-PDA-ESI/MSn; anthocyanins; phenols; tannins

References

  1. J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Jun;48(6):2249-52 - PubMed
  2. J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Oct;48(10):4581-9 - PubMed
  3. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:411-41 - PubMed
  4. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Mar;21(3):279-84 - PubMed
  5. J Food Prot. 2004 Aug;67(8):1806-11 - PubMed
  6. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18(19):2208-16 - PubMed
  7. J Nat Prod. 1990 May-Jun;53(3):587-95 - PubMed
  8. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2007 Dec;62(4):165-75 - PubMed
  9. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009 Jun 15;17(12):4022-34 - PubMed
  10. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Sep 15;134(3):244-8 - PubMed
  11. J Agric Food Chem. 2012 May 16;60(19):4841-8 - PubMed
  12. Food Chem. 2012 Dec 1;135(3):1863-7 - PubMed
  13. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013 Jan;72:202-7 - PubMed
  14. Food Chem. 2011 Jul 15;127(2):807-21 - PubMed
  15. Molecules. 2012 Dec 13;17(12):14821-40 - PubMed
  16. Phytochemistry. 2013 Oct;94:284-93 - PubMed
  17. Biofouling. 2013 Sep;29(8):929-37 - PubMed
  18. Food Chem. 2015 Jan 1;166:179-91 - PubMed
  19. Molecules. 2014 Aug 18;19(8):12500-8 - PubMed
  20. Food Chem. 2015 May 1;174:417-25 - PubMed
  21. Food Chem. 2012 Jun 1;132(3):1585-1591 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types