Display options
Share it on

J Mem Lang. 2015 Oct 01;84:88-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.005.

Repetition reduction during word and concept overlap in bilinguals.

Journal of memory and language

Tuan Q Lam, Viorica Marian

Affiliations

  1. Northwestern University.

PMID: 26166943 PMCID: PMC4495347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.005

Abstract

In natural conversation, speakers often mention the same referents multiple times. While referents that have been previously mentioned are produced with less prominence than those that have not been mentioned, it is unclear whether prominence reduction is due to repetition of concepts, words, or a combination of the two. In the current study, we dissociate these sources of repetition by examining bilingual speakers, who have more than one word for the same concept across their two languages. Three groups of Korean-English bilinguals (balanced, English-dominant, and Korean-dominant) performed an event description task involving repetition of referents within a single language (i.e., repetition of word and concept) or across languages (i.e., repetition of concept only). While balanced bilinguals reduced prominence both within and across languages, unbalanced bilinguals only reduced prominence when repetition occurred within a language. These patterns suggest that the degree to which words and concepts are linked within a speaker's language system determines the source of repetition reduction.

Keywords: bilingualism; concepts; lexical access; prominence; prosody; reduction; reference; repetition; speech production; words

References

  1. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 - PubMed
  2. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215 - PubMed
  4. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug;118(2):1038-54 - PubMed
  5. Cognition. 1987 Nov;27(2):181-218 - PubMed
  6. Lang Speech. 2004;47(Pt 1):31-56 - PubMed
  7. J Child Lang. 1990 Jun;17(2):417-31 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Nov;22(6):1482-93 - PubMed
  9. Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1137-46 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Rev. 1970 Jul;77(4):257-73 - PubMed
  11. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):505-12 - PubMed
  12. Cognition. 1997 Jul;64(1):1-37 - PubMed
  13. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null - PubMed
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):640-65 - PubMed
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):829-43 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Rev. 1991 Oct;98(4):604-14; discussion 615-8 - PubMed
  17. Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1548-57 - PubMed
  18. Lang Speech. 1988 Oct-Dec;31 ( Pt 4):307-19 - PubMed
  19. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jul;128(3):416-30 - PubMed
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1283-96 - PubMed
  21. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):940-67 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Rev. 2000 Jul;107(3):460-99 - PubMed
  23. Phonetica. 2005 Apr-Dec;62(2-4):146-59 - PubMed
  24. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):287-314 - PubMed
  25. Cognition. 1994 Dec;53(3):181-215 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Rev. 1986 Jul;93(3):283-321 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):748-65 - PubMed
  28. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):763-83 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support