Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul;6(4):160-9. doi: 10.1177/2040622315582353.
Potential for specific dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers to have a positive impact on cognitive function in humans: a systematic review.
Therapeutic advances in chronic disease
Jean Peters, Andrew Booth, Ruth Peters
Affiliations
Affiliations
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR). The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG, UK.
PMID: 26137206
PMCID: PMC4480546 DOI: 10.1177/2040622315582353
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is some evidence to suggest a possible association between calcium channel blocker (CCB) use and a lower decline in cognitive function compared with use of other hypertensive treatments. In particular, there is an emerging interest in the potential for specific CCBs, particularly the dihydropyridine CCBs nitrendipine, nicardipine, cilnidipine, lercandipine, nimodipine, azelnidipine and nilvadipine. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence relating to these specific CCBs and incident cognitive decline or dementia in humans.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out. The databases MEDLINE, Embase and PsychINFO were searched from 1980 to 18 April 2014. All abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers.
RESULTS: From 753 unique records, 16 full text articles were examined and three retained. The three articles reported data from two studies. A 12-week double-blind randomized controlled trial of nitrendipine compared with cilazapril and a longer and larger double-blind placebo-controlled trial also of nitrendipine, namely the Systolic Hypertension in Europe trial (SYST-EUR). Nitrendipine was associated with a reduction in incident dementia in the SYST-EUR trial. There was no association seen for cognitive outcomes in the smaller trial.
CONCLUSION: At present there is limited evidence to suggest that nitrendipine may be associated with reduction in incident dementia. This association comes from a single trial and needs to be replicated. Furthermore, there is no high-quality evidence for any of the other potential candidate CCBs.
Keywords: calcium antagonists; calcium channel blockers; cognitive decline; dementia; hypertension
References
- Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14;162(18):2046-52 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 1992 Apr 15;116(8):615-23 - PubMed
- Neurobiol Aging. 2005 Feb;26(2):157-63 - PubMed
- Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;65(12):1295-305 - PubMed
- Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;169(6):1203-10 - PubMed
- Eur J Pharmacol. 2011 Jun 1;659(2-3):124-9 - PubMed
- CMAJ. 1999 Sep 7;161(5):501-6 - PubMed
- J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(3):903-14 - PubMed
- Heart Dis. 2002 Nov-Dec;4(6):380-6 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD000147 - PubMed
- J Hypertens. 2014 Oct;32(10):1945-57; discussion 1957-8 - PubMed
- Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;7(5):250-61 - PubMed
- Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1218-26 - PubMed
- Arch Neurol. 2006 May;63(5):686-92 - PubMed
- J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24 Suppl 3:S73-7 - PubMed
- Neurobiol Aging. 2008 Feb;29(2):306-8 - PubMed
- Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1991;5 Suppl 1:S7-12 - PubMed
- Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(4):491-8 - PubMed
- Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;16(6):527-35 - PubMed
- Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 Sep;9(9):1413-31 - PubMed
- Lancet. 1998 Oct 24;352(9137):1347-51 - PubMed
- Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Feb 1;161(3):280-8 - PubMed
- Mol Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;17(3-4):149-62 - PubMed
Publication Types
Grant support