Display options
Share it on

Indian J Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;49(4):471-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.159680.

Anterior D-rod and titanium mesh fixation for acute mid-lumbar burst fracture with incomplete neurologic deficits: A prospective study of 56 consecutive patients.

Indian journal of orthopaedics

Zhe-Yuan Huang, Zhen-Qi Ding, Hao-Yuan Liu, Jun Fang, Hui Liu, Mo Sha

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, The 174 Hospital of PLA, Spinal Orthopaedics Center of PLA, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen Fujian Province, China.
  2. Department of Orthopaedics, The 175 Hospital of PLA, Traumatic Orthopaedics Center of PLA, Southeast Hospital of Xiamen University, Zhangzhou Fujian Province, China.
  3. Department of Orthopaedics, The 180 Hospital of PLA, Spinal Orthopaedics Center of PLA, Quanzhou Fujian Province, China.

PMID: 26229171 PMCID: PMC4510804 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.159680

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior decompression and reconstruction have gained wide acceptance as viable alternatives for unstable mid-lumbar burst fracture, but there are no mid and long term prospective studies regarding clinical and radiologic results of mid-lumbar burst fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study of 56 consecutive patients of mid-lumbar burst fractures with a load-sharing score of 7 or more treated with anterior plating was carried out. All patients were evaluated for radiologic and clinical outcomes. The fusion status, spinal canal compromise, segmental kyphotic angle (SKA), vertebral body height loss (VBHL), and adjacent segment degeneration was examined for radiologic outcome, whereas the American Spinal Injury Association scale, the visual analog scale (VAS), and the employment status were used for clinical evaluation.

RESULTS: The patients underwent clinical and radiologic followup for at least 5 years after the surgery. At the last followup, there was no case of internal fixation failure, adjacent segment degeneration, and other complications. Interbody fusion was achieved in all cases. The average fusion time was 4.5 months. No patient suffered neurological deterioration and the average neurologic recovery was 1.3 grades on final observation. Based on VAS pain scores, canal compromise, percentage of VBHL and SKA, the difference was statistically significant between the preoperative period and postoperative or final followup (P < 0.05). Results at postoperative and final followup were better than the preoperative period. However, the difference was not significant between postoperative and final followup (P > 0.05). Thirty-four patients who were employed before the injury returned to work after the operation, 15 had changed to less strenuous work.

CONCLUSION: Good mid term clinicoradiological results of anterior decompression with D-rod and titanium mesh fixation for suitable patients with mid-lumbar burst fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits can be achieved. The incident rate of complications was low. D-rod is a reliable implant and has some potential advantages in L4 vertebral fractures.

Keywords: Anterior lumbar fusion; Lumbar vertebrae; fracture fixation; internal fixation; lumbar burst fractures; mesh cage; neurologic deficit; neurologic deficits; spinal cord compression

References

  1. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan;86(1):48-55 - PubMed
  2. Surg Neurol. 1993 Aug;40(2):104-11 - PubMed
  3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Oct 1;21(19):2260-6; discussion 2267 - PubMed
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):195-203 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Feb;75(2):162-7 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosurg. 1995 Dec;83(6):977-83 - PubMed
  7. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Oct;23(10):1196-9 - PubMed
  8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Mar 1;18(3):320-5 - PubMed
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jul 15;22(14):1568-72; discussion 1573 - PubMed
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 15;32(14 ):1503-7 - PubMed
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Mar 15;22(6):686-90 - PubMed
  12. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Apr;73(2):92-8 - PubMed
  13. Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1007-11 - PubMed
  14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Jul;5(1):18-25 - PubMed
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 May 1;25(9):1157-70 - PubMed
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):773-81 - PubMed
  17. Orthopedics. 1992 Mar;15(3):367-73 - PubMed
  18. J Spinal Disord. 1992 Sep;5(3):335-43 - PubMed
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 15;22(4):370-5 - PubMed
  20. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Nov;15(8):566-9 - PubMed
  21. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S15-23 - PubMed
  22. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jan 15;26(2):213-7 - PubMed
  23. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;11(5):355-63 - PubMed
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):859-68 - PubMed
  25. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Nov-Dec;9(8):788-95 - PubMed
  26. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Jul;16(4):265-7 - PubMed
  27. Orthopedics. 2009 Oct;32(10 ):null - PubMed
  28. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Aug;16(8 Suppl):S440-4 - PubMed
  29. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Mar;17 (3):374-9 - PubMed
  30. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S7-14 - PubMed
  31. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991;80(1):45-8 - PubMed
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Mar 1;21(5):620-5 - PubMed
  33. Eur Spine J. 2003 Feb;12 (1):48-54 - PubMed
  34. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Aug;5(2):117-25 - PubMed
  35. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Oct;(189):103-15 - PubMed
  36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jul;15(7):667-73 - PubMed
  37. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1741-4 - PubMed
  38. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Apr;9(3):268-72 - PubMed

Publication Types