Display options
Share it on

Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 May 02;49(3):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.04.012. eCollection 2014.

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients: an individualized approach.

Revista brasileira de ortopedia

Osmar Valadão Lopes Júnior, Paulo Renato Saggin, Gilberto Matos do Nascimento, André Kuhn, José Saggin, André Manoel Inácio

Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.

PMID: 26229809 PMCID: PMC4511573 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.04.012

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate a series of skeletally immature patients who underwent three surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction according to each patient's growth potential.

METHODS: a series of 23 skeletally immature patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery at ages ranging from 7 to 15 years was evaluated prospectively. The surgical technique was individualized according to the Tanner sexual maturity score. The surgical techniques used were transphyseal reconstruction, partial transphyseal reconstruction and extraphyseal reconstruction. Four patients underwent the extraphyseal technique, seven the partial transphyseal technique and twelve the full transphyseal technique, on the ACL. The postoperative evaluation was based on the Lysholm score, clinical analysis on the knee and the presence of angular deformity or dysmetria of the lower limb.

RESULTS: the mean Lysholm score was 96.34 (±2.53). None of the patients presented differences in length and/or clinical or radiographic misalignment abnormality of the lower limbs.

CONCLUSION: ACL reconstruction using flexor tendon grafts in skeletally immature patients provided satisfactory functional results. Use of individualized surgical techniques according to growth potential did not give rise to physeal lesions capable of causing length discrepancies or misalignments of the lower limbs, even in patients with high growth potential.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Orthopedic procedures; Reconstruction

References

  1. Arthroscopy. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(9):955-9 - PubMed
  2. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2001 Feb;30(2):103-10 - PubMed
  3. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Jul-Aug;22(4):452-7 - PubMed
  4. Prog Pediatr Surg. 1990;25:123-31 - PubMed
  5. Sports Med. 2000 Jan;29(1):51-63 - PubMed
  6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Jan-Feb;(172):112-8 - PubMed
  7. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003 Jul;34(3):355-63 - PubMed
  8. Orthopedics. 2002 Aug;25(8):864-71; quiz 872-3 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):772-6 - PubMed
  10. Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12 ):1325-30 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83-A(5):725-34 - PubMed
  12. Am J Sports Med. 1986 May-Jun;14(3):205-10 - PubMed
  13. Orthopedics. 1998 Jun;21(6):659-63 - PubMed
  14. Arthroscopy. 1992;8(2):229-33 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Jan-Feb;22(1):48-54 - PubMed
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Oct;90(10 ):1317-22 - PubMed
  17. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;28(2):168-75 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 20;94(12 ):1112-9 - PubMed
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):38-41 - PubMed
  20. Arthroscopy. 1997 Oct;13(5):627-34 - PubMed
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;32(1):201-10 - PubMed
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Nov;77(6):890-4 - PubMed
  23. Arthroscopy. 2011 May;27(5):704-16 - PubMed
  24. J Knee Surg. 2002 Spring;15(2):72-6 - PubMed
  25. Am J Sports Med. 2012 May;40(5):1093-8 - PubMed
  26. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Nov;18(11):1481-6 - PubMed
  27. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Jul-Aug;22(4):478-84 - PubMed
  28. Am J Sports Med. 1988 Jan-Feb;16(1):44-7 - PubMed
  29. Arthroscopy. 1989;5(3):197-200 - PubMed
  30. Am J Sports Med. 1982 May-Jun;10 (3):150-4 - PubMed
  31. Arthroscopy. 2000 May-Jun;16(4):391-2 - PubMed

Publication Types