Display options
Share it on

Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Feb 18;50(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.001. eCollection 2015.

Radiographic study on the anatomical characteristics of the proximal femur in Brazilian adults.

Revista brasileira de ortopedia

Tércio Henrique Soares de Farias, Vinícius Quadros Borges, Eduardo Soares de Souza, Natália Miki, Fernando Abdala

Affiliations

  1. Hospital Municipal Dr. Cármino Caricchio, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  2. Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

PMID: 26229891 PMCID: PMC4519592 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the geometry of the femur in the Brazilian population by means of a radiographic study and to correlate the values with regard to sex and right/left side.

METHODS: Five hundred anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis of skeletally mature patients (250 of each sex) who did not present any osteoarthrosis, fractures or tumoral or infectious lesions were analyzed. The length and width of the femoral neck, length of the femoral axis, neck-shaft angle and femoral offset were measured.

RESULTS: The following means were observed: 36.54 mm for the length of the femoral neck; 37.48 mm for the width of the femoral neck; 108.42 mm for the length of the femoral axis; 130.47° for the neck-shaft angle; and 44.4 mm for the femoral offset.

CONCLUSION: The mean values for the main measurements on the proximal femur in Brazilians differed from those of previous studies. It could also be shown that there was a statistically significant mean difference between men and women for all the variables, both on the left and on the right side, and that the men had greater means than the women.

Keywords: Femur/anatomy and histology; Femur/physiology; Radiography

References

  1. Calcif Tissue Int. 1992 Jan;50(1):24-9 - PubMed
  2. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;44(2):120-4 - PubMed
  3. Bone. 1997 Mar;20(3):213-8 - PubMed
  4. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(2):91-7 - PubMed
  5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12 ):3371-6 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 May;71(3):475-7 - PubMed
  7. Clin Anat. 1997;10(5):318-23 - PubMed
  8. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6(2):136-40 - PubMed
  9. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(2):79-83 - PubMed
  10. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001 Aug;69(2):67-72 - PubMed
  11. Osteoporos Int. 1995 May;5(3):167-73 - PubMed
  12. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):28-32 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1498 - PubMed
  14. BMJ. 1994 Aug 20-27;309(6953):508-9 - PubMed
  15. J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Oct;8(10):1211-7 - PubMed
  16. Injury. 1999 Jun;30(5):327-32 - PubMed

Publication Types