Display options
Share it on

Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Feb 14;50(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.004. eCollection 2015.

Comparison of grafts for anatomical reconstruction of the ACL: patellar versus semitendinosus/gracilis.

Revista brasileira de ortopedia

Patrícia Barros Bitun, Carlos Roberto Miranda, Ricardo Boso Escudero, Marcelo Araf, Daphnis Gonçalves de Souza

Affiliations

  1. Dr. Carmino Caricchio Municipal Hospital, Municipal Hospital Administrative Authority of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

PMID: 26229896 PMCID: PMC4519648 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.004

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional results from surgical treatment for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with a single band, using two types of autologous grafts.

METHODS: Twenty-seven patients who underwent anatomical reconstruction of the ACL by means of the Chambat technique were evaluated prospectively. They were divided into two groups: A, with 14 patients, using grafts from flexor tendons; and B, with 13 patients, using grafts from the patellar tendon. In both groups, fixation was performed using an absorbable interference screw.

RESULTS: Based on the Lysholm score, group A presented a mean score of 71.6 in the first month, while B presented 75. At the end of the sixth month, both groups presented 96.6. Evaluation of the total IKDC showed that in the first month, the majority of the patients, both in group A (85.7%) and in group B (76.9%), presented a knee assessment that was close to normal. In the sixth month, 92.9% of group A had normal presentations, and 100% of group B.

CONCLUSION: According to the Lysholm functional evaluation and the IKDC subjective assessment, there was no statistically significant difference in the results between the groups, and the results were better in the sixth month.

Keywords: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament; Tendons; Transplants

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):1548-53 - PubMed
  2. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jun;14 (6):510-6 - PubMed
  3. Arthroscopy. 2005 Jul;21(7):791-803 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Apr;83(3):348-54 - PubMed
  5. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;29(4):420-5 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92 (4):871-81 - PubMed
  7. Arthroscopy. 2005 Jun;21(6):707-10 - PubMed
  8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Feb;15(2):115-25 - PubMed
  9. Arthroscopy. 2005 Aug;21(8):911-6 - PubMed
  10. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Jun;14 (6):517-28 - PubMed
  11. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2009 Dec;17 (4):247-51 - PubMed
  12. Arthroscopy. 2006 Jun;22(6):660-8 - PubMed
  13. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):384-94 - PubMed
  14. Knee. 2012 Mar;19(2):87-93 - PubMed
  15. BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):995-1001 - PubMed
  16. Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;46(1):40-4 - PubMed
  17. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1894-9 - PubMed
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):564-74 - PubMed
  19. Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10 ):1268 - PubMed
  20. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;28(4):446-52 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2321-8 - PubMed
  22. Am J Sports Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):214-20 - PubMed
  23. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):12-8 - PubMed
  24. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Feb;64(2):258-64 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):803-13 - PubMed
  26. Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10 ):1202 - PubMed

Publication Types