Display options
Cite
Shetty M, Rajalakshmi S, Krishna Prasad D. Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14:37-45doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x.
Shetty, M., Rajalakshmi, S., & Krishna Prasad, D. (2014). Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 1437-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x
Shetty, Manoj, et al. "Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems." Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society vol. 14 (2014): 37-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x
Shetty M, Rajalakshmi S, Krishna Prasad D. Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14:37-45. doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x. Epub 2014 Apr 23. PMID: 26199490; PMCID: PMC4502010.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014 Dec;14:37-45. doi: 10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

Comparison of Marginal Gap and Microleakage in Copy-Milled and Cad-Milled Zirconia Copings Bonded Using Light Cure and Chemical Cure Resin Bonding Systems.

Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

Manoj Shetty, S Rajalakshmi, D Krishna Prasad

Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, India.

PMID: 26199490 PMCID: PMC4502010 DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0359-x

Abstract

This in vitro study assessed the marginal gap and marginal microleakage in zirconia copings fabricated using two computer aided techniques- CAD milling and Copy milling and cemented to respective tooth preparations using two resin bonding systems, light cure and self-cure resin bonding systems. 32 extracted premolars were prepared to receive zirconia copings fabricated using CAD/CAM and Copy milling techniques. Once the copings were fabricated, the samples were evaluated for marginal fit prior to cementation through microscopic observation. Evaluation of marginal gap was done again after cementation, in order to incorporate the influence of the resin bonding system on the marginal microgap. The specimens were evaluated under the stereomicroscope for micro-leakage using commercial software. A comparative statistical analysis was done following data collection using Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test and chi-square test. The data collected regarding marginal gap was well within 120 µ, which is in accordance with previous studies. However, Copy milled specimens showed statistically lesser marginal gap when compared to CAD milled specimens. While comparing microleakage, it was observed that the microleakage in Copy milled specimens bonded with light cure resin bonded cement was statistically lesser than that of specimens cemented with chemical cure resin cement.(P = 0.003). This in vitro study concluded that Copy milling technique fabricated zirconia restorations with lesser marginal gap and microleakage score in comparison to CAD milled samples. Light cure resin bonding system also proved to be more effective option compared to self cure resin bonding systems. However, the limitations of this study should be taken into concern and further research should be aimed at a larger sample size to validate the results.

Keywords: CAD milling; Copy milling; Marginal gap; Microleakage; Resin bonding systems

References

  1. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Mar 01;18(2):e212-8 - PubMed
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Oct;62(4):405-8 - PubMed
  3. Int J Prosthodont. 1995 Jul-Aug;8(4):303-10 - PubMed
  4. Int J Prosthodont. 1990 May-Jun;3(3):241-8 - PubMed
  5. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jul;104(1):6-12 - PubMed
  6. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):109-16 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):83-7 - PubMed
  8. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003 Jul;15(6):469-76; quiz 477 - PubMed
  9. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jun;73(6):515-24 - PubMed
  10. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Oct;104(4):216-27 - PubMed
  11. Br Dent J. 1971 Aug 3;131(3):107-11 - PubMed
  12. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):529-35 - PubMed
  13. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14 - PubMed
  14. Braz Oral Res. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):261-6 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Mar;95(3):194-200 - PubMed
  16. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Dec;110(6):447-454.e10 - PubMed
  17. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):417-22 - PubMed
  18. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Feb;105(2):108-14 - PubMed

Publication Types