Display options
Share it on

Cell J. 2015;17(2):312-21. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2016.3738. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

Genotoxic Damage to Glioblastoma Cells Treated with 6 MV X-Radiation in The Presence or Absence of Methoxy Estradiol, IUDR or Topotecan.

Cell journal

Nazila Eyvazzadeh, Ali Neshasteh-Riz, Seyed Rabee Mahdavi, Afshin Mohsenifar

Affiliations

  1. Radiation Research Center, Faculty of Paramedicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Research and Department Nanozino, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 26199910 PMCID: PMC4503845 DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2016.3738

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the cumulative genotoxic damage to glioblastoma (GBM) cells, grown as multicellular spheroids, following exposure to 6 MV X-rays (2 Gy, 22 Gy) with or without, 2- methoxy estradiol (2ME2), iododeoxyuridine (IUDR) or topotecan (TPT), using the Picogreen assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The U87MG cells cultured as spheroids were treated with 6 MV X-ray using linear accelerator. Specimens were divided into five groups and irradiated using X-ray giving the dose of 2 Gy after sequentially incubated with one of the following three drug combinations: TPT, 2-ME2/TPT, IUDR/TPT or 2ME2/IUDR/ TPT. One specimen was used as the irradiated only sample (R). The last group was also irradiated with total dose of 22 Gy (each time 2 Gy) of 6 MV X-ray in 11 fractions and treated for three times. DNA damage was evaluated using the Picogreen method in the experimental study.

RESULTS: R/TPT treated group had more DNA damage [double strand break (DSB)/single strand break (SSB)] compared with the untreated group (P<0.05). Moreover the R/ TPT group treated with 2ME2 followed by IUDR had maximum DNA damage in spheroid GBM indicating an augmented genotoxicity in the cells. The DNA damage was induced after seven fractionated irradiation and two sequential treatments with 2ME2/IUDR/TPT. To ensure accuracy of the slope of dose response curve the fractionated radiation was calculated as 7.36 Gy with respect to α/β ratio based on biologically effective dose (BED) formulae.

CONCLUSION: Cells treated with 2ME2/IUDR showed more sensitivity to radiation and accumulative DNA damage. DNA damage was significantly increased when GBM cells treated with TPT ceased at S phase due to the inhibition of topoisomerase enzyme and phosphorylation of Chk1 enzyme. These results suggest that R/TPT- treated cells increase sensitivity to 2ME2 and IUDR especially when they are used together. Therefore, due to an increase in the level of DNA damage (SSB vs. DSB) and impairment of DNA repair machinery, more cell death will occur. This in turn may improve the treatment of GBM.

Keywords: 2-Methoxyestradiol; DNA Damage; HIF-1Alpha; Picogreen; Topotecan

References

  1. Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 1;65(19):8920-6 - PubMed
  2. Cell J. 2011 Summer;13(2):83-90 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Cancer. 1997 Oct;33(12 ):2011-5 - PubMed
  4. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Aug;43(8):2561-5 - PubMed
  5. Stem Cells. 2010 Apr;28(4):639-48 - PubMed
  6. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Jul;38(1):45-51 - PubMed
  7. Pathobiology. 1999 May-Jun;67(3):148-57 - PubMed
  8. Carcinogenesis. 2012 Jan;33(1):149-55 - PubMed
  9. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;314:287-305 - PubMed
  10. Strahlenther Onkol. 2001 Dec;177(12):656-61 - PubMed
  11. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):441-8 - PubMed
  12. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;922:274-92 - PubMed
  13. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jan 27;7:9 - PubMed
  14. Arch Toxicol. 2008 Nov;82(11):861-7 - PubMed
  15. Br J Radiol. 2008 Oct;81 Spec No 1:S28-35 - PubMed
  16. Mol Pharm. 2009 May-Jun;6(3):905-17 - PubMed
  17. Exp Cell Res. 2005 Feb 15;303(2):432-46 - PubMed
  18. Open Biomed Eng J. 2008 Sep 10;2:43-51 - PubMed
  19. J Control Release. 2010 Jan 4;141(1):13-21 - PubMed
  20. Drug Resist Updat. 2003 Dec;6(6):355-61 - PubMed
  21. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2009 Jan;9(1):55-65 - PubMed
  22. Ann Oncol. 1997 Sep;8(9):837-55 - PubMed
  23. Anticancer Drugs. 2010 Feb;21(2):202-5 - PubMed
  24. Anticancer Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2B):873-80 - PubMed
  25. Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2792-7 - PubMed
  26. J Neurooncol. 2009 Jun;93(2):253-60 - PubMed
  27. Neuro Oncol. 2011 Dec;13(12):1288-95 - PubMed
  28. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Oct 1;87(2):356-62 - PubMed
  29. Biointerphases. 2010 Sep;5(3):FA88-97 - PubMed
  30. J Theor Biol. 2007 Mar 7;245(1):161-8 - PubMed
  31. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Sep;92(3):334-8 - PubMed
  32. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 May-Jun;60(3):166-93 - PubMed
  33. Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v190-3 - PubMed
  34. Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):213-7 - PubMed
  35. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Sep 6;81(17):1322-5 - PubMed
  36. J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Nov;16(11):2631-6 - PubMed
  37. Radiother Oncol. 2005 May;75(2):237-45 - PubMed
  38. Br J Cancer. 1998;77(3):385-90 - PubMed
  39. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011 Jan 1;331(1):119-28 - PubMed

Publication Types