Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00965. eCollection 2015.

Trust and mindreading in adolescents: the moderating role of social value orientation.

Frontiers in psychology

Jeffrey Derks, Manon A Van Scheppingen, Nikki C Lee, Lydia Krabbendam

Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Neuroscience and Research Institute LEARN!, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  2. Department of Educational Neuroscience and Research Institute LEARN!, Faculty of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University Tilburg, Netherlands.

PMID: 26257665 PMCID: PMC4508490 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00965

Abstract

In adolescence, aspects of cognition that are required to deal with complex cooperation situations, such as mentalising and social value orientation, are still in development. In the Trust Game, cooperation may lead to better outcomes for both players, but can also lead to exploitation by the trustee. In the present study, we explore how mindreading, a crucial aspect of mentalising, and social value orientation (whether someone is prosocial or proself) are related to trust. In a group of 217 students (51% girls, Mage = 15.1) social value orientation, mindreading and trust (using the Trust Game) were measured. The result show that social value orientation moderates the relation between mindreading and trust. In the group of prosocials, we find no correlation between mindreading and trust. In the group of proselfs, mindreading is negatively correlated to trust, indicating that proselfs use their mentalising skills to assess that the trustee is likely to exploit them.

Keywords: adolescence; mindreading; social development; social value orientation; trust

References

  1. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Apr 1;67(7):692-4 - PubMed
  2. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Apr;9(4):395-402 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2005 Apr 1;308(5718):78-83 - PubMed
  4. J Adolesc. 2014 Feb;37(2):175-84 - PubMed
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Oct;73(4):733-46 - PubMed
  6. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 May;11(2):139-45 - PubMed
  7. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2009 Mar;14(2):127-43 - PubMed
  8. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Jan;7(1):44-52 - PubMed
  9. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 15;61(6):731-3 - PubMed
  10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):296-312 - PubMed
  11. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jul;222(2):293-302 - PubMed
  12. Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):686-8 - PubMed
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Dec;93(6):994-1010 - PubMed
  14. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):398-409 - PubMed
  15. Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;47(Pt 3):453-80 - PubMed
  16. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Jun;66(4):322-7 - PubMed
  17. Judgm Decis Mak. 2011 Aug;6(6):552-564 - PubMed
  18. Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):331-8 - PubMed
  19. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Aug;61(4):355-63 - PubMed
  20. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;38(7):813-22 - PubMed
  21. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2013 Jul;18(4):326-54 - PubMed
  22. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1379-86 - PubMed
  23. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 May;10(5):619-27 - PubMed
  24. J Adolesc. 2012 Oct;35(5):1341-9 - PubMed
  25. Mol Autism. 2013 Sep 11;4(1):33 - PubMed
  26. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Jun;24(3):383-403; discussion 403-51 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):60-70 - PubMed
  28. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;40(Pt 1):133-55 - PubMed
  29. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 - PubMed
  30. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):271-8 - PubMed

Publication Types