Display options
Share it on

Cartilage. 2015 Jul;6(3):142-9. doi: 10.1177/1947603515573987.

Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in the Knee: Interobserver Agreement and Clinical Application.

Cartilage

Gokhan Meric, Guilherme C Gracitelli, Julie C McCauley, Pamela A Pulido, Eric Y Chang, Christine B Chung, William D Bugbee

Affiliations

  1. Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey.
  2. Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  3. Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  4. Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA ; Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  5. Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

PMID: 26175859 PMCID: PMC4481388 DOI: 10.1177/1947603515573987

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a suitable treatment option for large osteochondral defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an objective, reproducible, noninvasive monitoring tool for postoperative assessment after cartilage surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in patients undergoing OCA transplantation in the knee with clinical outcomes and determine interobserver agreement of this scoring system.

METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent OCA transplantation in the knee and received a postoperative MRI. Four examiners read each MRI and completed an OCAMRISS. Interobserver agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated. Correlation between the OCAMRISS and clinical outcomes was calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS: Interobserver agreement on individual features of the OCAMRISS was superior (κ = 0.81-1.0) in 65% of comparisons, substantial (κ = 0.61-0.8) in 14%, moderate (κ = 0.41-0.6) in 18%, and fair (κ = 0.21-0.4) in 3%. Agreement among readers was very strong for the cartilage, bone, ancillary, and total scores with 96% of comparisons having an ICC >0.80. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) function scores were correlated with OCAMRISS cartilage score (ρ = 0.53, P = 0.044) and total score (ρ = 0.67, P = 0.006). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sports/recreation subscale was correlated with OCAMRISS ancillary score (ρ = 0.58, P = 0.049) and total score (ρ = 0.64, P = 0.024). No correlation was observed with subchondral bone features of OCAMRISS and any of the outcome scores.

CONCLUSIONS: The recently described OCAMRISS is a reproducible grading system for in vivo evaluation after osteochondral allograft transplantation.

Keywords: cartilage repair; knee; magnetic resonance imaging; osteochondral allograft transplantation

References

  1. Cartilage. 2011 Apr;2(2):100-21 - PubMed
  2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 May;468(5):1269-78 - PubMed
  3. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1618-27 - PubMed
  4. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jan;33(1):180-8 - PubMed
  5. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):870-83 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Mar 6;95(5):426-32 - PubMed
  7. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2022-32 - PubMed
  8. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2008 Dec;12(4):302-17 - PubMed
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jun;(435):79-87 - PubMed
  10. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1426-34 - PubMed
  11. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1832-40 - PubMed
  12. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):564-72 - PubMed
  13. Cartilage. 2014 Jan 1;5(1):16-27 - PubMed
  14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jun;22(6):1288-97 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):907-14 - PubMed
  16. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011 Jul;15(3):221-37 - PubMed
  17. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul;19(7):1582-94 - PubMed
  18. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2680-8 - PubMed
  19. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Dec;9(6):377-92 - PubMed
  20. Invest Radiol. 2009 Sep;44(9):603-12 - PubMed
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):NP48-50 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jan;57(1):16-23 - PubMed
  23. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1074-81 - PubMed
  24. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;(391 Suppl):S379-96 - PubMed
  25. Magn Reson Med. 2013 Jun;69(6):1745-53 - PubMed
  26. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2689-98 - PubMed
  27. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13 - PubMed
  28. Am J Sports Med. 2009 May;37(5):902-8 - PubMed
  29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 May 21;96(10):824-30 - PubMed
  30. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1695-702 - PubMed
  31. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):72-81 - PubMed
  32. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Feb;22(2):121-33 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support