Telemed J E Health. 2016 Feb;22(2):144-152. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0033. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

Implementation of the Integrated Electronic Patient Portal in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association

Ruth A Bush, Cynthia D Connelly, Martha Fuller, Alexa Pérez

PMID: 26258289 PMCID: PMC5209291 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0033

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the current state of knowledge regarding the use of the integrated electronic health record (EHR) patient portal for pediatric clinical care. A systematic examination of the research on implementation, utilization, and evaluation of the integrated EHR patient portal among pediatric patients has not been previously conducted. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to systematically review existing research on the state of the science, describe the way others have defined the patient portal, and examine pediatric patient portal utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Covering a period from 1992 to 2014 a literature search was conducted on four electronic databases. Only articles in English were reviewed. Studies were included if they reported the use of a patient portal integrated with an electronic health record and captured pediatric medial encounters. Qualitative or quantitative studies of any design were eligible as long as they focused on patients (or parents) who access their health records through an electronic portal tied to an EHR and reported measures of satisfaction, attitudes on use, barriers and facilitators, adherence, or clinical and health outcomes. Content analysis of each article was performed independently by at least two authors using an extraction grid of study qualities, and quality and relevance of the studies were also assessed.

RESULTS: Of a total of 189 potentially relevant publications identified, 31 full-text publications were obtained after screening titles and abstracts. After a full review, 11 publications corresponding to seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological approaches included cross-sectional surveys, retrospective analysis, qualitative studies, and usability testing. In general, feedback was positive. The most frequent negative comments about the portal reflected concern about teenager interaction with the portal and how that might affect communication among patient, parent, and provider. Some users were frustrated with the complexity of medical terminology used.

CONCLUSIONS: Reflecting the additional considerations of pediatric proxy access and fewer chronically ill patients, pediatric medicine has yet to use the patient portal as a modality for outcomes measurement. Given the paucity of studies within this age group, it is difficult to measure outcome improvements or the effect of patient record access on healthcare behaviors. This systematic review presents innovative research on the general acceptance of the patient portal among parents and highlights that the implementation of the portal is still in its early stages and has yet to be used widely in diverse populations or studies in a longitudinal manner. Further studies should confirm that protected access to health information and secure communication and information sharing with healthcare providers have an impact in the pediatric population on healthcare outcomes.

Keywords: adolescent; electronic health record; electronic medical record; electronic patient portal; pediatrics

References

1. J Med Internet Res. 2010 Jul 29;12(3):e30 - PubMed
2. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):655-70 - PubMed
3. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Dec;19(12):979-81 - PubMed
4. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12 - PubMed
5. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 06;16(3):e75 - PubMed
6. Health Informatics J. 2014 Jun;20(2):151-62 - PubMed
7. J Pediatr. 2013 Jul;163(1):280-1.e1-2 - PubMed
8. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 26;15(8):e168 - PubMed
9. Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1639-46 - PubMed
10. Inform Prim Care. 2010;18(1):41-9 - PubMed
11. Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1469-76 - PubMed
12. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):677-87 - PubMed
13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1486-92 - PubMed
14. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Dec;29(12):714-8; quiz 719-20 - PubMed
15. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2008;5:13 - PubMed
16. Acad Pediatr. 2013 May-Jun;13(3):264-71 - PubMed
17. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Jan 16;13:9 - PubMed
18. Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):e183-90 - PubMed
19. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):737-43 - PubMed
20. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94 - PubMed
21. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):660-9 - PubMed
22. J Med Internet Res. 2011 May 27;13(2):e40 - PubMed
23. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 May;165(5):405-11 - PubMed
24. J Ambul Care Manage. 2014 Apr-Jun;37(2):120-6 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article

Grant support

• K99 HS022404/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States
• R00 HS022404/HS/AHRQ HHS/United States