Display options
Share it on

Springerplus. 2015 Aug 07;4:398. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1175-4. eCollection 2015.

Effects of different stocking densities on performance and activity of cattle × yak hybrids along a transhumance route in the Eastern Himalaya.

SpringerPlus

Shanker R Barsila, Naba R Devkota, Michael Kreuzer, Svenja Marquardt

Affiliations

  1. ETH Zurich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Universitätstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Agriculture and Forestry University, Directorate of Research and Extension, Chitwan, Nepal.

PMID: 26261756 PMCID: PMC4526511 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1175-4

Abstract

Twelve lactating cattle × yak hybrids (B. taurus × B. grunniens) were investigated on five experimental pastures (Sites 1-5), following an up- and downward transhumance route (3,200, 4,000, 4,500, 4,000 and 2,600 m a.s.l.). Hybrids were kept in replicated groups of two (low SD) and four animals per paddock (high SD). As a control, yaks (with calves) were included at low SD at Sites 2-4. Performance was described by body weight, milk yield and composition. Herbage samples as selected by the animals were analyzed. Activity patterns of the hybrids were assessed at Sites 2-4. At similar body weight change and milk composition, the individual hybrids on average produced 26% less milk at high than at low SD. However, at high SD on average still 49% more milk/m(2) of pasture area was produced. Milk fat increased with time from 5.4 to 7.1%, milk protein decreased from 4.2 to 3.3%. At high SD, the hybrids spent less time standing and more time lying. The yaks gained weight at 4,500 m a.s.l. while the hybrids lost weight (+836 and -653 g/animal/day, respectively). In conclusion, high SD reduced individual milk yield and forced hybrids to spend more time for feeding. The yaks apparently had an advantage over the hybrids at very high altitude.

Keywords: Grasslands; Himalaya; Hybrids; Milk composition; Nepal; Yaks

References

  1. J Dairy Res. 1997 May;64(2):207-19 - PubMed
  2. J Dairy Res. 2008 Aug;75(3):357-64 - PubMed
  3. Anim Genet. 2010 Jun;41(3):242-52 - PubMed
  4. Br J Nutr. 1961;15:109-19 - PubMed
  5. Food Chem. 2008 Jul 15;109(2):299-309 - PubMed
  6. J Dairy Res. 1999 May;66(2):165-76 - PubMed
  7. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Oct;97(5):933-41 - PubMed
  8. J Anim Sci. 2009 Aug;87(8):2719-31 - PubMed
  9. J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97 - PubMed
  10. Int J Biometeorol. 1976 Jun;20(2):139-56 - PubMed

Publication Types