Display options
Share it on

J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1755-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1755. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Effect of arm position and foot placement on the five times sit-to-stand test completion times of female adults older than 50 years of age.

Journal of physical therapy science

Shamay S M Ng, Patrick W H Kwong, Michael S P Chau, Isaac C Y Luk, Sam S Wan, Shirley S M Fong

Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
  2. Institute of Human Performance, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

PMID: 26180314 PMCID: PMC4499977 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.1755

Abstract

The five times-sit-to stand test (FTSTS) is a clinical test which is commonly used to assessed the functional muscle strength of the lower limbs of older adults. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different arm positions and foot placements on the FTSTS completion times of older female adults. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-nine healthy female subjects, aged 63.1±5.3 years participated in this cross-sectional study. The times required to complete the FTSTS with 3 different arm positions (hands on thighs, arms crossed over chest, and an augmented arm position with the arms extended forward) and 2 foot placements (neutral and posterior) were recorded. The interaction effect and main effect of arm positions and foot placements were examined using a 3 (arm position) × 2 (foot placement) two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). [Results] There was no interaction effect among the 3 arm positions in the 2 foot placements. A significant main effect was identified for foot placement, but not arm position. Posterior foot placement led to a shorter FTSTS time compared to that of normal foot placement. [Conclusion] With the same arm position, FTSTS completion times with posterior foot placement tended to be shorter. Therefore, the standard foot placement should be used for FTSTS administration.

Keywords: Outcomes; Rehabilitation; Standing

References

  1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Nov;59(11):1207-12 - PubMed
  2. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;89(6):497-504 - PubMed
  3. Percept Mot Skills. 1995 Feb;80(1):163-6 - PubMed
  4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Jun;43(6):603-9 - PubMed
  5. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Feb;80(2):195-8 - PubMed
  6. Age Ageing. 1996 Sep;25(5):386-91 - PubMed
  7. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):407-13 - PubMed
  8. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 May;14(4):236-46 - PubMed
  9. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5(2):124-33 - PubMed
  10. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Aug;57(8):M539-43 - PubMed
  11. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1431-6 - PubMed
  12. J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Apr;15(4):271-6 - PubMed
  13. Phys Ther. 2002 Sep;82(9):866-79 - PubMed
  14. J Nutr. 1993 Feb;123(2 Suppl):465-8 - PubMed
  15. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Sep;26(9):1403-4 - PubMed
  16. J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94 - PubMed
  17. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1575-7 - PubMed
  18. Mov Disord. 2003 Feb;18(2):157-62 - PubMed
  19. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):550-60 - PubMed
  20. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):583-6 - PubMed
  21. N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):556-61 - PubMed
  22. Am J Med. 1985 Jan;78(1):77-81 - PubMed
  23. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):314-9 - PubMed
  24. Phys Ther. 2005 Oct;85(10):1034-45 - PubMed
  25. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jun;75(6):653-60 - PubMed
  26. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996 May;28(2):79-88 - PubMed
  27. J Vestib Res. 2006;16(4-5):233-43 - PubMed
  28. Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:469-88 - PubMed

Publication Types