Display options
Cite
Gorey KM, Richter NL, Luginaah IN, et al. Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States. Soc Work Res. 2015;39(2):107-118doi: 10.1093/swr/svv006.
Gorey, K. M., Richter, N. L., Luginaah, I. N., Hamm, C., Holowaty, E. J., Zou, G., & Balagurusamy, M. K. (2015). Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States. Social work research, 39(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svv006
Gorey, Kevin M, et al. "Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States." Social work research vol. 39,2 (2015): 107-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svv006
Gorey KM, Richter NL, Luginaah IN, Hamm C, Holowaty EJ, Zou G, Balagurusamy MK. Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States. Soc Work Res. 2015 May 21;39(2):107-118. doi: 10.1093/swr/svv006. PMID: 26180488; PMCID: PMC4500640.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Soc Work Res. 2015 May 21;39(2):107-118. doi: 10.1093/swr/svv006.

Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States.

Social work research

Kevin M Gorey, Nancy L Richter, Isaac N Luginaah, Caroline Hamm, Eric J Holowaty, GuangYong Zou, Madhan K Balagurusamy

Affiliations

  1. Professor, School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4, Canada; Telephone: 519 253-3000, ext. 3085.
  2. Research Associate, School of Social Work, University of Windsor.
  3. Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair, Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
  4. Medical Oncologist, Windsor Regional Cancer Center, and Assistant Professor, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
  5. Professor, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
  6. Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario and Scientist, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario.
  7. Statistician and Research Associate, School of Social Work, University of Windsor.

PMID: 26180488 PMCID: PMC4500640 DOI: 10.1093/swr/svv006

Abstract

This historical study estimated the protective effects of a universally accessible, single-payer health care system versus a multi-payer system that leaves many uninsured or underinsured by comparing breast cancer care of women living in high poverty neighborhoods in Ontario or California between 1996 and 2011. Women in Canada experienced better care particularly as compared to women who were inadequately insured in the United States. Women in Canada were diagnosed earlier (rate ratio [RR] = 1.12) and enjoyed better access to breast conserving surgery (RR = 1.48), radiation (RR = 1.60) and hormone therapies (RR = 1.78). Women living in high poverty Canadian neighborhoods even experienced shorter waits for surgery (RR = 0.58) and radiation therapy (RR = 0.44) than did such women in the US. Consequently, women in Canada were much more likely to survive longer. Regression analyses indicated that health insurance could explain most of the better care and better outcomes in Canada. Over this study's 15-year timeframe 31,500 late diagnoses, 94,500 sub-optimum treatment plans and 103,500 early deaths were estimated in high poverty US neighborhoods due to relatively inadequate health insurance coverage. Implications for social work practice, including advocacy for future reforms of US health care are discussed.

Keywords: Affordable Care Act; breast cancer; health care reform; health insurance; poverty; single-payer system

References

  1. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jan 15;149(2):195-7 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1481-4 - PubMed
  3. Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1655-71 - PubMed
  4. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct 12;7:167 - PubMed
  5. BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 24;12:897 - PubMed
  6. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug;9(8):730-56 - PubMed
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 22;14:133 - PubMed
  8. Int J Equity Health. 2013 Jan 14;12:6 - PubMed
  9. Health Soc Work. 2010 Nov;35(4):243-7 - PubMed
  10. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2013 Apr-Jul;83(2 Pt 3):352-8 - PubMed
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Sep 1;156(5):471-82 - PubMed
  12. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1568-75 - PubMed
  13. Can J Surg. 2005 Jun;48(3):185-94 - PubMed
  14. Can J Public Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;97(6):435-9 - PubMed
  15. Health Place. 1999 Jun;5(2):157-71 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;59(1):67-76 - PubMed
  17. Popul Health Metr. 2006 Oct 18;4:11 - PubMed
  18. Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):156-63 - PubMed
  19. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2012;8(1):29-52 - PubMed
  20. Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:52-66 - PubMed
  21. Epidemiology. 2006 Sep;17(5):512-9 - PubMed
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):5497-502 - PubMed
  23. Breast J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-34 - PubMed
  24. Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):779-85 - PubMed
  25. Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Oct;2(5):236-41 - PubMed
  26. Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):112-9 - PubMed
  27. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Sep-Oct;52(5):277-300 - PubMed
  28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:120-30 - PubMed
  29. Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):121-4 - PubMed
  30. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Apr;87(1):3-16 - PubMed
  31. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jan;32(1):78-86 - PubMed
  32. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1543-51 - PubMed
  33. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Sep;28(9):1136-42 - PubMed
  34. Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):89-95 - PubMed
  35. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Nov;17 (9):1477-98 - PubMed
  36. Am J Public Health. 2011 Aug;101(8):1456-65 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support