Display options
Cite
Chaudhury A. 2D DIGE Does Not Reveal all: A Scotopic Report Suggests Differential Expression of a Single "Calponin Family Member" Protein for Tetany of Sphincters!. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015;2:42doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00042.
Chaudhury, A. (2015). 2D DIGE Does Not Reveal all: A Scotopic Report Suggests Differential Expression of a Single "Calponin Family Member" Protein for Tetany of Sphincters!. Frontiers in medicine, 242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00042
Chaudhury, Arun. "2D DIGE Does Not Reveal all: A Scotopic Report Suggests Differential Expression of a Single "Calponin Family Member" Protein for Tetany of Sphincters!." Frontiers in medicine vol. 2 (2015): 42. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00042
Chaudhury A. 2D DIGE Does Not Reveal all: A Scotopic Report Suggests Differential Expression of a Single "Calponin Family Member" Protein for Tetany of Sphincters!. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015 Jun 18;2:42. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00042. eCollection 2015. PMID: 26151053; PMCID: PMC4471425.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Med (Lausanne). 2015 Jun 18;2:42. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00042. eCollection 2015.

2D DIGE Does Not Reveal all: A Scotopic Report Suggests Differential Expression of a Single "Calponin Family Member" Protein for Tetany of Sphincters!.

Frontiers in medicine

Arun Chaudhury

Affiliations

  1. GIM Foundation , Little Rock, AR , USA.

PMID: 26151053 PMCID: PMC4471425 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2015.00042

Abstract

Using 2D differential gel electrophoresis (DIGE) and mass spectrometry (MS), a recent report by Rattan and Ali (2015) compared proteome expression between tonically contracted sphincteric smooth muscles of the internal anal sphincter (IAS), in comparison to the adjacent rectum [rectal smooth muscles (RSM)] that contracts in a phasic fashion. The study showed the differential expression of a single 23 kDa protein SM22, which was 1.87 fold, overexpressed in RSM in comparison to IAS. Earlier studies have shown differences in expression of different proteins like Rho-associated protein kinase II, myosin light chain kinase, myosin phosphatase, and protein kinase C between IAS and RSM. The currently employed methods, despite its high-throughput potential, failed to identify these well-characterized differences between phasic and tonic muscles. This calls into question the fidelity and validatory potential of the otherwise powerful technology of 2D DIGE/MS. These discrepancies, when redressed in future studies, will evolve this recent report as an important baseline study of "sphincter proteome." Proteomics techniques are currently underutilized in examining pathophysiology of hypertensive/hypotensive disorders involving gastrointestinal sphincters, including achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), spastic pylorus, seen during diabetes or chronic chemotherapy, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and recto-anal incontinence. Global proteome mapping may provide instant snapshot of the complete repertoire of differential proteins, thus expediting to identify the molecular pathology of gastrointestinal motility disorders currently labeled "idiopathic" and facilitating practice of precision medicine.

Keywords: gastrointestinal motility; inhibitory neurotransmission; phasic; smooth muscle; tonic

References

  1. J Biol Chem. 2012 Jun 1;287(23):19018-28 - PubMed
  2. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;(191):1-14 - PubMed
  3. Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Apr;25(8):3173-81 - PubMed
  4. J Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;225(2):506-11 - PubMed
  5. Cell Signal. 2003 Aug;15(8):763-72 - PubMed
  6. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012 Sep 15;303(6):G713-22 - PubMed
  7. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Mar 6;94(3):385-94 - PubMed
  8. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1999 Feb;20(2):133-46 - PubMed
  9. Gastroenterology. 2013 Nov;145(5):1160-1 - PubMed
  10. Biochem J. 1995 Sep 15;310 ( Pt 3):1037-43 - PubMed
  11. Acta Physiol Scand. 1998 Dec;164(4):341-8 - PubMed
  12. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):260-1 - PubMed
  13. Am J Physiol. 1998 Sep;275(3 Pt 1):C684-92 - PubMed
  14. Am J Physiol. 1991 Apr;260(4 Pt 1):G537-42 - PubMed
  15. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Dec;212(4):293-305 - PubMed
  16. Cell Signal. 1993 Nov;5(6):677-86 - PubMed
  17. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Mar;15(3):178-96 - PubMed
  18. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2012 Apr;302(7):G664-75 - PubMed
  19. Biochem J. 1987 Jun 15;244(3):705-9 - PubMed
  20. Gastroenterology. 2007 Dec;133(6):1960-70 - PubMed
  21. FEBS Lett. 1998 Jul 17;431(2):134-7 - PubMed
  22. Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Feb;21(4):1336-44 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;68:345-74 - PubMed
  24. J Physiol. 1923 Dec 28;58(2-3):175-203 - PubMed
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Nov;89(5):1985-90 - PubMed
  26. Gastroenterology. 2015 Mar;148(3):533-536.e4 - PubMed
  27. Front Med (Lausanne). 2014 Apr 10;1:8 - PubMed
  28. Proteomics. 2005 Jul;5(10):2561-9 - PubMed
  29. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2003 Dec;35(12):1407-20 - PubMed
  30. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011 Sep;301(3):G498-507 - PubMed
  31. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015 Apr 1;308(7):G605-12 - PubMed
  32. Front Med (Lausanne). 2014 Jun 20;1:17 - PubMed
  33. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2010;96:35-62 - PubMed
  34. Eur J Biochem. 1992 May 1;205(3):1067-75 - PubMed
  35. Gastroenterology. 2008 Aug;135(2):610-20 - PubMed
  36. Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):705-10 - PubMed
  37. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Aug;281(2):G467-78 - PubMed
  38. Cardiovasc Res. 2011 Apr 1;90(1):28-37 - PubMed
  39. J Biol Chem. 1987 Mar 5;262(7):2988-93 - PubMed

Publication Types