Display options
Share it on

BMC Nurs. 2015 Aug 11;14:42. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0094-6. eCollection 2015.

Validation of three pain scales among adult postoperative patients in Ghana.

BMC nursing

Lydia Aziato, Florence Dedey, Kissinger Marfo, James Avoka Asamani, Joe Nat A Clegg-Lamptey

Affiliations

  1. Department of Adult Health, School of Nursing, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana ; School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P.O. Box LG 43, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
  2. Department of Surgery, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.
  3. Public Health Unit (Biostatistics), Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
  4. Human Resource Planning and Research, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.

PMID: 26265901 PMCID: PMC4531519 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-015-0094-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain assessment is an important component of pain management and health professionals require valid tools to assess pain to guide their pain management decisions. The study sought to select, develop, and validate context-appropriate unidimensional pain scales for pain assessment among adult post-operative patients.

METHODS: A mixed methods design was adopted. The study was conducted at two hospitals in Accra, Ghana. The qualitative phase involved 17 patients and 25 nurses, and the quantitative phase involved 150 post-operative patients. Qualitative data was collected iteratively through individual interviews and focus groups.

RESULTS: Two existing pain scales (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] and Wong-Baker FACES [FPS] scales) and one new pain scale (Colour-Circle Pain Scale-[CCPS]) were validated. The psychometric properties of the three scales were assessed when patients had fully recovered from anesthesia. The CCPS had higher scale preference than NRS and FPS. Convergent validity was very good and significant (0.70-0.75). Inter-rater reliability was high (0.923-0.928) and all the scales were sensitive to change in the intensity or level of pain experienced before and after analgesia such as paracetamol and diclofenac suppositories, injectable pethidine, and oral tramadol had been administered.

CONCLUSION: Using a valid tool for pain assessment gives the clinician an objective criterion for pain management. Due to the subjective nature of pain, consideration of socio-cultural factors for the particular context ensures that the appropriate tool is used.

References

  1. J Pain. 2011 Aug;12(8):840-8 - PubMed
  2. Aust J Rural Health. 2004 Feb;12(1):22-7 - PubMed
  3. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996 Sep;12(3):172-81 - PubMed
  4. J Pain. 2005 Aug;6(8):526-34 - PubMed
  5. Ghana Med J. 2005 Jun;39(2):63-7 - PubMed
  6. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Sep;47(8):1013-9 - PubMed
  7. J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):297-304 - PubMed
  8. Emerg Nurse. 2007 Mar;14(10):6-10 - PubMed
  9. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):216-21 - PubMed
  10. Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):e33 - PubMed
  11. Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8 - PubMed
  12. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008 Mar;46(1):25-9 - PubMed
  13. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Dec;7(4):267-75 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Pain. 2010 Sep;14(8):864.e1-7 - PubMed
  15. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Apr;17(4):333-40 - PubMed
  16. Clin J Pain. 2007 Jul-Aug;23(6):497-505 - PubMed
  17. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):265-72 - PubMed
  18. BMJ. 2009 Oct 30;339:b4234 - PubMed
  19. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(3):241-9 - PubMed
  20. Pain Med. 2007 Oct-Nov;8(7):601-10 - PubMed
  21. J Transcult Nurs. 2015 May;26(3):301-7 - PubMed
  22. West J Nurs Res. 2008 Dec;30(8):975-90 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support