Display options
Share it on

Mol Cytogenet. 2015 Jul 08;8:49. doi: 10.1186/s13039-015-0140-9. eCollection 2015.

Preimplantation genetic screening of blastocysts by multiplex qPCR followed by fresh embryo transfer: validation and verification.

Molecular cytogenetics

Yu-Shih Yang, Shun-Ping Chang, Hsin-Fu Chen, Gwo-Chin Ma, Wen-Hsiang Lin, Chi-Fang Lin, Feng-Po Tsai, Cheng-Hsuan Wu, Horng-Der Tsai, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Ming Chen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  2. Department of Genomic Medicine, and Center for Medical Genetics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
  3. Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
  4. Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  5. Poyuan Women Clinic, Changhua, Taiwan.
  6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
  7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  8. Department of Life Sciences, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.

PMID: 26157486 PMCID: PMC4495615 DOI: 10.1186/s13039-015-0140-9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aneuploidy is an important etiology of implantation failure and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) seems a promising preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) technology to detect aneuploidies. This verification study aimed at verifying the impact on reproductive outcomes in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using fresh embryo transfer (FET) in which the embryos were selected by blastocyst biopsy with qPCR-based PGS in our settings.

RESULTS: A total of 13 infertile couples with more than once failed in vitro fertilization were enrolled during July to October of 2014. PGS was conducted by qPCR with selectively amplified markers to detect common aneuploidies (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y). The design of the qPCR molecular markers adopted the locked nucleic acid (LNA) strategy. The blastocyst biopsy was performed on Day 5/6 and the PGS was done on the same day, which enabled FET. A total of 72 blastocysts were biopsied. Successful diagnoses were established in all embryos and the rate of successful diagnosis was 100 %. The aneuploidy rate was 38.9 % (28/72). 28 embryos were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate was 61.5 % (8/13) per cycle. Early first trimester abortion was encountered in 1 and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 53.8 % (7/13) per cycle.

CONCLUSION: This study verified the favorable outcome of adopting PGS with qPCR + FET in our own setting. Expanding the repertoire of aneuploidies being investigated (from a limited set to all 24 chromosomes) is underway and a randomized study by comparing qPCR and other PGS technologies is warranted.

Keywords: Aneuploidy; Blastocyst; Fresh embryo transfer; PGS; qPCR

References

  1. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):1044-8 - PubMed
  2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3758-62 - PubMed
  3. Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):870-5 - PubMed
  4. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):595-602 - PubMed
  5. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8 - PubMed
  6. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(16):4546-53 - PubMed
  7. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010 Aug;16(8):583-9 - PubMed
  8. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010 Aug;16(8):590-600 - PubMed
  9. Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1435-44 - PubMed
  10. Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):819-24 - PubMed
  11. Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1846-50 - PubMed
  12. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 May;29(5):381-90 - PubMed
  13. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):157.e1-6 - PubMed
  14. J Med Genet. 2014 Aug;51(8):553-62 - PubMed
  15. Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):638-40 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jul;23(7):901-6 - PubMed
  17. Fertil Steril. 2013 Apr;99(5):1400-7 - PubMed
  18. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):697-703 - PubMed
  19. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):454-66 - PubMed
  20. Mol Cytogenet. 2014 May 22;7:33 - PubMed
  21. Nat Med. 2009 May;15(5):577-83 - PubMed
  22. Fertil Steril. 2013 Dec;100(6):1695-703 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):9-17 - PubMed
  24. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Dec;27(6):644-53 - PubMed
  25. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2802-13 - PubMed
  26. Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):608-14 - PubMed

Publication Types