Display options
Share it on

Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jul 07;9:178. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00178. eCollection 2015.

The role of the amygdala in the perception of positive emotions: an "intensity detector".

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience

Louise Bonnet, Alexandre Comte, Laurent Tatu, Jean-Louis Millot, Thierry Moulin, Elisabeth Medeiros de Bustos, Burch, Burch, Heller

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Besancon University Hospital Besancon, France ; Department of Research in Functional Imaging, CIC 808, Besancon University Hospital Besancon, France ; Laboratory of Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience, EA 481, SFR FED 4234 UFC-CHRU-EFS Besancon, France.
  2. Department of Research in Functional Imaging, CIC 808, Besancon University Hospital Besancon, France ; Laboratory of Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience, EA 481, SFR FED 4234 UFC-CHRU-EFS Besancon, France.
  3. Laboratory of Integrative and Clinical Neuroscience, EA 481, SFR FED 4234 UFC-CHRU-EFS Besancon, France.

PMID: 26217205 PMCID: PMC4493392 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00178

Abstract

The specific role of the amygdala remains controversial even though the development of functional imaging techniques has established its implication in the emotional process. The aim of this study was to highlight the sensitivity of the amygdala to emotional intensity (arousal). We conducted an analysis of the modulation of amygdala activation according to variation in emotional intensity via an fMRI event-related protocol. Monitoring of electrodermal activity, a marker of psychophysiological emotional perception and a reflection of the activation of the autonomic nervous system, was carried out concurrently. Eighteen subjects (10 men; aged from 22 to 29 years) looked at emotionally positive photographs. We demonstrated that the left and right amygdalae were sensitive to changes in emotional intensity, activating more in response to stimuli with higher intensity. Furthermore, electrodermal responses were more frequent for the most intense stimuli, demonstrating the concomitant activation of the autonomic nervous system. These results highlight the sensitivity of the amygdala to the intensity of positively valenced visual stimuli, and in conjunction with results in the literature on negative emotions, reinforce the role of the amygdala in the perception of intensity.

Keywords: IAPS; amygdala; electrodermal response; emotion; emotional intensity; fMRI

References

  1. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Sep;3(3):207-33 - PubMed
  2. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 May;27(5):392-401 - PubMed
  3. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar 15;53(6):494-501 - PubMed
  4. J Neurosci Methods. 2009 May 30;180(1):57-70 - PubMed
  5. Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):437-40 - PubMed
  6. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003 Jan;41(1):88-123 - PubMed
  7. Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):657-64 - PubMed
  8. Neurosci Lett. 2006 Sep 1;404(3):282-7 - PubMed
  9. Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421 - PubMed
  10. Psychophysiology. 2002 Mar;39(2):124-32 - PubMed
  11. Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jun;58(1):57-70 - PubMed
  12. J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 12;23(32):10274-82 - PubMed
  13. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59 - PubMed
  14. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):581-3 - PubMed
  15. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):811-30 - PubMed
  16. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Feb;25(2):97-109 - PubMed
  17. Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):64-74 - PubMed
  18. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003 Oct;23(4-5):727-38 - PubMed
  19. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):585-96 - PubMed
  20. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):196-202 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8903-7 - PubMed
  22. Neuron. 2007 Sep 20;55(6):970-84 - PubMed
  23. Neuroreport. 2001 Aug 28;12(12):2779-83 - PubMed
  24. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Nov;35(11):1437-44 - PubMed
  25. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):701-11 - PubMed
  26. Psychophysiology. 1981 May;18(3):232-9 - PubMed
  27. Psychol Rev. 1975 Mar;82(2):116-49 - PubMed
  28. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):221-30 - PubMed
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Dec;16(10):1717-29 - PubMed
  30. Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):379-83 - PubMed
  31. J Neurosci. 2003 Jul 2;23(13):5627-33 - PubMed
  32. Rev Neurosci. 2003;14(4):303-16 - PubMed
  33. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;8:107 - PubMed
  34. Neuroimage. 2003 Mar;18(3):650-9 - PubMed
  35. Cereb Cortex. 2007 Mar;17(3):742-8 - PubMed
  36. Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):2958-65 - PubMed
  37. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;156(10 ):1618-29 - PubMed
  38. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2864-85 - PubMed
  39. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):773-83 - PubMed
  40. Nature. 1996 Oct 31;383(6603):812-5 - PubMed
  41. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Sep;31(9):1446-57 - PubMed
  42. Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73 - PubMed
  43. J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1;16(13):4207-21 - PubMed
  44. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Sep;3(3):233-43 - PubMed
  45. Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2524-33 - PubMed
  46. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Feb 1;53(3):211-5 - PubMed
  47. J Neurosci. 2000 Oct 1;20(19):RC99 - PubMed
  48. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):760-6 - PubMed
  49. Behav Brain Res. 2011 Oct 1;223(2):403-10 - PubMed
  50. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Aug;14(2):187-93 - PubMed
  51. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(10 ):1415-25 - PubMed
  52. Neuroimage. 2004 Feb;21(2):768-80 - PubMed
  53. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Dec;23(4):200-9 - PubMed
  54. Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):1265-70 - PubMed
  55. Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):513-31 - PubMed
  56. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Aug;37(9):989-97 - PubMed
  57. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2004 May;45(2):96-103 - PubMed

Publication Types