Display options
Share it on

Front Public Health. 2015 Jul 13;3:178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00178. eCollection 2015.

Effectiveness of Personalized Feedback Alone or Combined with Peer Support to Improve Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Malays with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Frontiers in public health

Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina, Colette Joy Browning, Shajahan Yasin

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia , Serdang, Selangor , Malaysia.
  2. Royal District Nursing Service Limited, RDNS Research Institute , St. Kilda, VIC , Australia.
  3. Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia , Bandar Sunway, Selangor , Malaysia.

PMID: 26217658 PMCID: PMC4500101 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00178

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity is an important aspect of self-management among older people with type 2 diabetes but many remain inactive. Interventions to improve physical activity levels have been studied but few studies have evaluated the effects of personalized feedback (PF) or peer support (PS); and there was no study on older people of Asian heritage. Hence, this trial evaluated whether PF only or combined with PS improves physical activity among older Malays with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to usual care only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a primary healthcare clinic in Malaysia. Sixty-nine sedentary Malays aged 60 years and older with T2DM who received usual diabetes care were randomized to PF or PS interventions or as controls for 12 weeks with follow-ups at weeks 24 and 36. Intervention groups performed unsupervised walking activity and received written feedback on physical activity. The PS group also received group and telephone contacts from trained peer mentors. The primary outcome was pedometer steps. Secondary outcomes were self-reported physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance, quality of life, and psychosocial wellbeing.

RESULTS: Fifty-two (75.4%) completed the 36-week study. The PS group showed greater daily pedometer readings than the PF and controls (p = 0.001). The PS group also had greater improvement in weekly duration (p < 0.001) and frequency (p < 0.001) of moderate intensity physical activity, scores on the Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (p = 0.003), 6-min walk test (p < 0.001), and social support from friends (p = 0.032) than PF and control groups.

CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that PF combined with PS in older Malays with T2DM improved their physical activity levels, cardiorespiratory fitness, and support from friends.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71447000.

Keywords: elderly Malays; peer support; personalized feedback; physical activity; type 2 diabetes mellitus

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD002968 - PubMed
  2. BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 03;12:1043 - PubMed
  3. Malays J Nutr. 2010 Apr;16(1):13-37 - PubMed
  4. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;87(3):293-301 - PubMed
  5. Malays J Nutr. 2010 Apr;16(1):101-12 - PubMed
  6. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9 - PubMed
  7. Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):132-40 - PubMed
  8. Metabolism. 2008 May;57(5):605-11 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):217-24 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jan;23(1):e1-4 - PubMed
  11. Soc Indic Res. 2013 Aug;113(1):355-372 - PubMed
  12. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1632-6 - PubMed
  13. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Sep 18;147(6):357-69 - PubMed
  14. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1):98-107 - PubMed
  15. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Feb 17;4:4 - PubMed
  16. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-30 - PubMed
  17. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 10;165(18):2114-20 - PubMed
  18. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7 - PubMed
  19. J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(3):313-29 - PubMed
  20. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):387-98 - PubMed
  21. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1094-105 - PubMed
  22. Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):3-6 - PubMed
  23. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):310-23 - PubMed
  24. J Nurs Meas. 2004 Winter;12(3):235-47 - PubMed
  25. Health Promot J Austr. 2008 Dec;19(3):189-95 - PubMed
  26. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62 - PubMed
  28. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:271589 - PubMed
  29. Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7 - PubMed
  30. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62 - PubMed
  31. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Jan 17;4:1 - PubMed
  32. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Aug;44(10):756-61 - PubMed
  33. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2013 Jul;25(4):316-25 - PubMed
  34. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2249-58 - PubMed
  35. Diabetologia. 2003 Aug;46(8):1071-81 - PubMed
  36. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):132-7 - PubMed
  37. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8 - PubMed
  38. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Mar;55(3):191-9 - PubMed
  39. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33 - PubMed
  40. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e26 - PubMed
  41. Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i62-8 - PubMed
  42. Diabetes Care. 2002 Oct;25(10):1722-8 - PubMed
  43. Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i23-32 - PubMed
  44. Front Public Health. 2013 Dec 23;1:71 - PubMed
  45. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-35 - PubMed
  46. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):837-41 - PubMed
  47. BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 15;2(6):null - PubMed
  48. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed
  49. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):216-27 - PubMed
  50. J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Jan;15(1):25-31 - PubMed

Publication Types