Front Public Health. 2015 Jul 13;3:178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00178. eCollection 2015.
Effectiveness of Personalized Feedback Alone or Combined with Peer Support to Improve Physical Activity in Sedentary Older Malays with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Frontiers in public health
Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina, Colette Joy Browning, Shajahan Yasin
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia , Serdang, Selangor , Malaysia.
- Royal District Nursing Service Limited, RDNS Research Institute , St. Kilda, VIC , Australia.
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia , Bandar Sunway, Selangor , Malaysia.
PMID: 26217658
PMCID: PMC4500101 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00178
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity is an important aspect of self-management among older people with type 2 diabetes but many remain inactive. Interventions to improve physical activity levels have been studied but few studies have evaluated the effects of personalized feedback (PF) or peer support (PS); and there was no study on older people of Asian heritage. Hence, this trial evaluated whether PF only or combined with PS improves physical activity among older Malays with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to usual care only.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in a primary healthcare clinic in Malaysia. Sixty-nine sedentary Malays aged 60 years and older with T2DM who received usual diabetes care were randomized to PF or PS interventions or as controls for 12 weeks with follow-ups at weeks 24 and 36. Intervention groups performed unsupervised walking activity and received written feedback on physical activity. The PS group also received group and telephone contacts from trained peer mentors. The primary outcome was pedometer steps. Secondary outcomes were self-reported physical activity, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance, quality of life, and psychosocial wellbeing.
RESULTS: Fifty-two (75.4%) completed the 36-week study. The PS group showed greater daily pedometer readings than the PF and controls (p = 0.001). The PS group also had greater improvement in weekly duration (p < 0.001) and frequency (p < 0.001) of moderate intensity physical activity, scores on the Physical Activity Scale for Elderly (p = 0.003), 6-min walk test (p < 0.001), and social support from friends (p = 0.032) than PF and control groups.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that PF combined with PS in older Malays with T2DM improved their physical activity levels, cardiorespiratory fitness, and support from friends.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71447000.
Keywords: elderly Malays; peer support; personalized feedback; physical activity; type 2 diabetes mellitus
References
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD002968 - PubMed
- BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 03;12:1043 - PubMed
- Malays J Nutr. 2010 Apr;16(1):13-37 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar;87(3):293-301 - PubMed
- Malays J Nutr. 2010 Apr;16(1):101-12 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):132-40 - PubMed
- Metabolism. 2008 May;57(5):605-11 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):217-24 - PubMed
- Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Jan;23(1):e1-4 - PubMed
- Soc Indic Res. 2013 Aug;113(1):355-372 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1632-6 - PubMed
- Ann Intern Med. 2007 Sep 18;147(6):357-69 - PubMed
- Diabetes Educ. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1):98-107 - PubMed
- Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Feb 17;4:4 - PubMed
- Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1510-30 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 10;165(18):2114-20 - PubMed
- Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7 - PubMed
- J Adv Nurs. 2006 May;54(3):313-29 - PubMed
- Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):387-98 - PubMed
- Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1094-105 - PubMed
- Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):3-6 - PubMed
- Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun;41(3):310-23 - PubMed
- J Nurs Meas. 2004 Winter;12(3):235-47 - PubMed
- Health Promot J Austr. 2008 Dec;19(3):189-95 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62 - PubMed
- J Aging Res. 2012;2012:271589 - PubMed
- Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7 - PubMed
- J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62 - PubMed
- Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Jan 17;4:1 - PubMed
- Br J Sports Med. 2010 Aug;44(10):756-61 - PubMed
- Asia Pac J Public Health. 2013 Jul;25(4):316-25 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2249-58 - PubMed
- Diabetologia. 2003 Aug;46(8):1071-81 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):132-7 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8 - PubMed
- Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Mar;55(3):191-9 - PubMed
- Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33 - PubMed
- J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e26 - PubMed
- Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i62-8 - PubMed
- Diabetes Care. 2002 Oct;25(10):1722-8 - PubMed
- Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i23-32 - PubMed
- Front Public Health. 2013 Dec 23;1:71 - PubMed
- J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-35 - PubMed
- Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):837-41 - PubMed
- BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 15;2(6):null - PubMed
- Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed
- Am J Prev Med. 2011 Aug;41(2):216-27 - PubMed
- J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Jan;15(1):25-31 - PubMed
Publication Types