Display options
Cite
Rasooli S, Moslemi F, Golzari SE. Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Meperidine Infiltration Versus Intravenous Paracetamol: A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Post-Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopic Pain. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(3):e26414doi: 10.5812/aapm.26414v2.
Rasooli, S., Moslemi, F., & Golzari, S. E. (2015). Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Meperidine Infiltration Versus Intravenous Paracetamol: A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Post-Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopic Pain. Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 5(3), e26414. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.26414v2
Rasooli, Sousan, et al. "Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Meperidine Infiltration Versus Intravenous Paracetamol: A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Post-Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopic Pain." Anesthesiology and pain medicine vol. 5,3 (2015): e26414. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.26414v2
Rasooli S, Moslemi F, Golzari SE. Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Meperidine Infiltration Versus Intravenous Paracetamol: A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Post-Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopic Pain. Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun 22;5(3):e26414. doi: 10.5812/aapm.26414v2. eCollection 2015 Jun. PMID: 26161328; PMCID: PMC4493731.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun 22;5(3):e26414. doi: 10.5812/aapm.26414v2. eCollection 2015 Jun.

Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine-Meperidine Infiltration Versus Intravenous Paracetamol: A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy in Post-Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopic Pain.

Anesthesiology and pain medicine

Sousan Rasooli, Farnaz Moslemi, Samad E J Golzari

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  2. Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

PMID: 26161328 PMCID: PMC4493731 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.26414v2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pain following laparoscopy could be due to different causes requiring effective postoperative analgesia.

OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we evaluated the combined effect of intraperitoneal infiltration of bupivacaine-meperidine versus intravenous infusion of paracetamol on pain relief after diagnostic gynecologic laparoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 90 female subjects with ASA class I or II scheduled for gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy were studied in two groups; group B + M received intraperitoneal infiltration of 40 mL bupivacaine 0.25% with 50 mg of meperidine, group P received normal saline via abdominal trocar and ten minutes before the end of operation, group P received infusion of paracetamol 1000 mg in normal saline. Postoperative pain was evaluated using VAS score in PACU and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after the operation. The time to the first analgesic administration and total analgesic requirements were recorded.

RESULTS: Group B + M had significantly lower pain score in the first 8 postoperative hours than group P (P < 0.05). Rescue meperidine (IM) requirement was significantly less in B + M group compared to group P. Time to first request for analgesia was different between the two groups (78 versus 60 min); however, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal Infiltration of bupivacaine with meperidine following surgery provided more appropriate analgesia after gynecologic diagnostic laparoscopy than administration of IV paracetamol.

Keywords: Bupivacaine; Gynecologic Diagnostic Laparoscopy; Meperidine; Pain, Postoperative; Paracetamol

References

  1. Saudi J Anaesth. 2009 Jul;3(2):70-6 - PubMed
  2. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2009 Jan- Mar;7(25):50-3 - PubMed
  3. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Mar 14;4(2):e15499 - PubMed
  4. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6(3):133-40 - PubMed
  5. Saudi Med J. 2009 Jun;30(6):813-6 - PubMed
  6. BMC Urol. 2012 May 04;12:13 - PubMed
  7. J Anesth. 2007;21(2):294 - PubMed
  8. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79(3):369-78 - PubMed
  9. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Mar;44(3):280-4 - PubMed
  10. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):757-73, table of contents - PubMed
  11. JSLS. 2005 Jul-Sep;9(3):316-21 - PubMed
  12. Anesth Analg. 2000 Sep;91(3):667-70 - PubMed
  13. Anaesthesia. 1993 May;48(5):382-6 - PubMed
  14. Coll Antropol. 2009 Mar;33(1):299-302 - PubMed
  15. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):725-41 - PubMed
  16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;284(6):1455-60 - PubMed
  17. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Aug;10(3):311-5 - PubMed
  18. Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Summer;3(1):214-8 - PubMed
  19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;106(3):213-5 - PubMed
  20. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Aug;48(7):867-70 - PubMed

Publication Types