Display options
Share it on

Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015 Sep;22(5):521-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 08.

Antimicrobial activities of Saudi honey against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Saudi journal of biological sciences

Alaa A M Al-Nahari, Saad B Almasaudi, El Sayed M Abd El-Ghany, Elie Barbour, Soad K Al Jaouni, Steve Harakeh

Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Saudi Arabia.
  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.
  3. Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon ; Biochemistry Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Department of Hematology and Yousef Abdullatif Jameel Chair of Prophetic Medicine Application, Faculty of Medicine, KAU, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, KAU, Saudi Arabia.

PMID: 26288553 PMCID: PMC4537880 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.006

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Five types of imported and local honey were screened for both their bacteriocidal/bacteriostatic activities against both Imipenem resistant and sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa in both Brain Heart infusion broth and Mueller-Hinton agar. The results indicated that the effect was concentration and type of honey dependant. All types of honey tested exerted a full inhibition of bacterial growth at the highest concentration tested of 50% at 24 h of contact. The inhibitory effect of honey on bacterial growth was clear with concentrations of 20% and 10% and this effect was most evident in the case of Manuka honey as compared to Nigella sativa honey and Seder honey. Manuka honey UMF +20 showed a bacteriocidal activity on both Imipenem resistant and sensitive P. aeruginosa, while Seder honey and N. sativa honey exerted only a bacteriostatic effect. Manuka honey UMF +10 showed most effect on antimicrobial resistance. Manuka honey UMF +10 had an effect on modulation of Imipenem resistant P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSION: The results indicated that various types of honey affected the test organisms differently. Modulation of antimicrobial resistance was seen in the case Manuka honey UMF +10.

Keywords: Imipenem resistant and sensitive; Manuka honey; Nigella sativa honey; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Saudi Arabia; Seder honey

References

  1. J Wound Care. 1999 Apr;8(4):161-4 - PubMed
  2. J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Oct 9;50(21):5870-7 - PubMed
  3. J Med Food. 2003 Summer;6(2):129-33 - PubMed
  4. J Med Food. 2005 Spring;8(1):100-3 - PubMed
  5. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;61(10):1705-7 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008 Dec;27(6):677-89 - PubMed
  7. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jun 15;407(13):4022-7 - PubMed
  8. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010 Sep 02;10:47 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;30(2):167-71 - PubMed
  10. Biotechnol Res Int. 2011;2011:917505 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 28;6(3):e18229 - PubMed
  12. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2007 Jun 30;20(2):83-8 - PubMed
  13. Microbiology. 2012 Dec;158(Pt 12):3005-13 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55898 - PubMed
  15. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011 Apr;1(2):154-60 - PubMed
  16. J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jul;115(1):86-90 - PubMed
  17. Vet J. 2014 Jan;199(1):110-4 - PubMed
  18. PeerJ. 2014 Mar 25;2:e326 - PubMed
  19. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014 May 12;13:19 - PubMed
  20. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Mar;70(3):716-25 - PubMed
  21. Int J Bacteriol. 2014;2014:795281 - PubMed

Publication Types