Display options
Share it on

United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Aug;3(4):325-34. doi: 10.1177/2050640615581732.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of POEM for achalasia.

United European gastroenterology journal

Lavinia A Barbieri, Cesare Hassan, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Loredana Correale, Alessandro Repici

Affiliations

  1. Endoscopy Unit and Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy.

PMID: 26279840 PMCID: PMC4528214 DOI: 10.1177/2050640615581732

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy (POEM) represents a less invasive alternative, as compared with conventional laparoscopic Heller myotomy for treating achalasia patients. In the last years, a number of prospective and retrospective experiences with POEM use for achalasia have been published.

METHODS: Relevant publications in which patients affected by achalasia underwent POEM treatment were identified by PubMed databases for the period 2010 - 2013. From each study, we extracted the number and type of major complications (defined as those requiring any additional medical or surgical intervention). Data were pooled, using random-effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by using Cochran's Q and the I (2) statistic.

RESULTS: We found 16 studies that provided data on 551 patients. The median surveillance period was 6 months (range: 3-12). The median of mean POEM duration was 156 minutes (range: 42-112). Median myotomy length was 10 cm (range: 6-14). Technical and clinical success were reported in 97% (95% CI: 94-98%) and 93% (407/428; 95% CI: 90-95%). No heterogeneity (I (2 )= 0%) or publication bias was present in both estimates. When limiting the analysis only to adverse events that require medical or surgical interventions, major adverse events occurred in 14% (95% CI: 11-17%); however, only one patient needed post-POEM surgery (0.2%; 95% CI: 0-0.5%).

CONCLUSIONS: POEM appeared to be a highly feasible and effective endoscopic treatment for achalasia. Despite POEM being apparently associated with relatively high morbidity, most patients are successfully managed conservatively, so that POEM appears as a very safe procedure; however, POEM should only be performed in centers able to treat POEM complications, such as pneumothorax or pneumoperitoneum.

Keywords: Achalasia; adverse events; complications; endoscopic esphageal myotomy; esophageal sphincter; esophagus; myotomy; peristalsis; review; safety; swallowing

References

  1. Endoscopy. 2013 Jul;45(7):579-81 - PubMed
  2. Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):309-11.e1-3 - PubMed
  3. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):751-6 - PubMed
  4. Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):161-6 - PubMed
  5. Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):659-67 - PubMed
  6. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jul 26;301(4):184-92 - PubMed
  7. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):39-44 - PubMed
  8. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13(2):96-101; discussion 102-3 - PubMed
  9. Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1158-65 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):823-8 - PubMed
  11. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71 - PubMed
  12. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900 - PubMed
  13. Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1023-30 - PubMed
  14. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3910 - PubMed
  15. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jan;18(1):92-8; discussion 98-9 - PubMed
  16. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):598-605 - PubMed
  17. Endoscopy. 2014 Apr;46(4):298-301 - PubMed
  18. Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):43-51 - PubMed
  19. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1807-16 - PubMed
  20. Gastrointest Endosc. 1980 Feb;26(1):8-10 - PubMed
  21. Ann Surg. 2006 Feb;243(2):196-203 - PubMed
  22. Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3322-38 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1868-70 - PubMed
  24. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):885-91; discussion 891-2 - PubMed
  25. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):29-38 - PubMed
  26. Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):400-5 - PubMed
  27. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94 - PubMed
  28. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8 - PubMed
  29. Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1803-9 - PubMed
  30. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 30;13:22 - PubMed
  31. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 May;77(5):719-25 - PubMed
  32. Clin Endosc. 2013 Mar;46(2):161-7 - PubMed
  33. Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2644-9 - PubMed
  34. Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov;26(11):3267-72 - PubMed
  35. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Aug 16;5(8):379-90 - PubMed
  36. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Dec;57(6):794-7 - PubMed
  37. Ann Surg. 1997 Jun;225(6):655-64; discussion 664-5 - PubMed
  38. Br J Surg. 2008 Dec;95(12):1488-94 - PubMed
  39. Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):761-4 - PubMed
  40. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):411-7 - PubMed
  41. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jul;17(7):1188-92 - PubMed
  42. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4547-55 - PubMed
  43. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Sep;78(3):468-75 - PubMed
  44. Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1098-103 - PubMed
  45. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):228-35 - PubMed
  46. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep;217(3):442-51 - PubMed
  47. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Oct;44(10):827-32 - PubMed
  48. Surg Endosc. 1998 Mar;12(3):270-3 - PubMed
  49. Gut. 2000 May;46(5):597-600 - PubMed

Publication Types