Display options
Share it on

Front Neuroanat. 2015 Sep 01;9:116. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00116. eCollection 2015.

Analysis of shape and spatial interaction of synaptic vesicles using data from focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM).

Frontiers in neuroanatomy

Mahdieh Khanmohammadi, Rasmus P Waagepetersen, Jon Sporring

Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University Aalborg, Denmark.

PMID: 26388743 PMCID: PMC4555025 DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00116

Abstract

The spatial interactions of synaptic vesicles in synapses were assessed after a detailed characterization of size, shape, and orientation of the synaptic vesicles. We hypothesized that shape and orientation of the synaptic vesicles are influenced by their movement toward the active zone causing deviations from spherical shape and systematic trends in their orientation. We studied three-dimensional representations of synapses obtained by manual annotation of focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) images of male mouse brain. The configurations of synaptic vesicles were regarded as marked point patterns, where the points are the centers of the vesicles, and the mark of a vesicle is given by its size, shape, and orientation characteristics. Statistics for marked point processes were employed to study spatial interactions between vesicles. We found that the synaptic vesicles in excitatory synapses appeared to be of oblate ellipsoid shape and in inhibitory synapses appeared to be of cigar ellipsoid shape, and followed a systematic pattern regarding their orientation toward the active zone. Moreover, there was strong evidence of spatial alignment in the orientations of pairs of synaptic vesicles, and of repulsion between them only in excitatory synapses, beyond that caused by their physical extent.

Keywords: K-function; mark variogram; orientation analysis; shape analysis; synaptic vesicles; three-dimensional point process

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jul;86(14):5656-60 - PubMed
  2. Front Neuroanat. 2009 Oct 05;3:18 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 19;28(12):2959-64 - PubMed
  4. J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 25;32(4):1253-60 - PubMed
  5. J Comp Neurol. 2009 Jun 1;514(4):343-52 - PubMed
  6. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Feb 10;8:6 - PubMed
  7. J Neurosci. 1993 Jun;13(6):2313-22 - PubMed
  8. J Vis Exp. 2011 Nov 11;(57):null - PubMed
  9. Epilepsy Res. 1997 Oct;28(3):225-31 - PubMed
  10. Front Neuroanat. 2014 Aug 26;8:85 - PubMed
  11. Neuron. 1995 May;14(5):983-9 - PubMed
  12. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):645-53 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 1965 Aug 7;207(997):642-3 - PubMed
  14. Front Neuroinform. 2010 May 21;4:9 - PubMed
  15. Biophys J. 2008 Dec 15;95(12):5789-97 - PubMed
  16. Magn Reson Med. 2006 Jan;55(1):136-46 - PubMed
  17. Neuron. 1996 Jun;16(6):1197-207 - PubMed
  18. Epilepsia. 1980 Dec;21(6):571-85 - PubMed
  19. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jun 30;137(7):1589-601 - PubMed
  20. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003 May;60(5):942-60 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosci. 1996 Jun 15;16(12):3960-7 - PubMed
  22. Brain Res. 1969 Jun;14(1):137-45 - PubMed
  23. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Apr;1014:170-8 - PubMed
  24. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jan;6(1):57-69 - PubMed
  25. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):201-7 - PubMed

Publication Types