Display options
Share it on

Biomater Res. 2014 Oct 20;18:16. doi: 10.1186/2055-7124-18-16. eCollection 2014.

Immobilizing hydroxycholesterol with apatite on titanium surfaces to induce ossification.

Biomaterials research

Cen Chen, Hyeong Cheol Yang, In-Seop Lee

Affiliations

  1. Bio-X Center, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018 China.
  2. Department of Dental Biomaterials Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 110-749 Korea.
  3. Bio-X Center, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018 China ; Institute of Natural Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749 Korea.

PMID: 26331067 PMCID: PMC4552360 DOI: 10.1186/2055-7124-18-16

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immobilizing bioactive molecules and osteoconductive apatite on titanium implants have investigated direct ossification. In this study, hydroxycholesterol (HC) was immobilized with apatite on titanium through simply adsorption or sandwich-like coating. Three kinds of hydroxycholesterol were chosen to induce ossification: 20α-hydroxycholesterol (20α- HC), 22(S)-hydroxycholesterol (22(S)-HC) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-HC).The effects of HC/apatite coating on ossification abilities were evaluated in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS: At 6 d, adsorbed apatite/25-HC and apatite/22(S)-HC coating exhibited some cytotoxicity, while the cell viability of apatite/20α-HC coating was similar as apatite coating. Immobilizing HC with apatite significantly enhanced the ALP activities compared with apatite coating. There was no significant difference in ALP value between adsorbed apatite/HC coating and sandwich-like apatite/HC/apatite coating. When compared with apatite coating, the mineral deposition improved by adsorbed HC with apatite at higher concentration in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS: When compared with apatite coating, immobilizing HC with apatite coating induced the ossification in vitro and in vivo.

Keywords: Apatite; Hydroxycholesterol; Ossification; Titanium

References

  1. J Lipid Res. 1997 Oct;38(10):2049-61 - PubMed
  2. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 Jul;10(7):591-9 - PubMed
  3. Biomaterials. 2013 Jul;34(23):5737-46 - PubMed
  4. Biomaterials. 2013 Apr;34(12):2855-64 - PubMed
  5. J Control Release. 2012 Jun 28;160(3):676-84 - PubMed
  6. Biomed Mater. 2013 Dec;8(6):065005 - PubMed
  7. Biomed Mater. 2014 Jun;9(3):035007 - PubMed
  8. Biomed Mater. 2011 Aug;6(4):045004 - PubMed
  9. Biomed Mater. 2013 Aug;8(4):045009 - PubMed
  10. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 Oct 21;47(39):11056-8 - PubMed
  11. Biomaterials. 2013 Aug;34(24):5883-90 - PubMed
  12. Biomed Mater. 2010 Aug;5(4):044107 - PubMed
  13. Biomed Mater. 2014 Aug;9(4):045007 - PubMed
  14. Biomaterials. 2011 Nov;32(33):8676-83 - PubMed
  15. Acta Biomater. 2010 Jun;6(6):2274-81 - PubMed
  16. J Control Release. 2013 Mar 10;166(2):172-81 - PubMed
  17. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014 Apr 11;446(3):726-30 - PubMed
  18. Biomed Mater. 2012 Apr;7(2):024108 - PubMed
  19. Eur Cell Mater. 2011 Aug 26;22:84-96; discussion 96 - PubMed
  20. J Control Release. 2013 Sep 10;170(2):198-208 - PubMed
  21. J Cell Biochem. 2011 Jun;112(6):1673-84 - PubMed
  22. Biomaterials. 2011 Jul;32(21):4896-902 - PubMed
  23. Biomaterials. 2014 Jul;35(21):5565-71 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Nutr. 2010 Oct;49(7):435-46 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 May;19(5):830-40 - PubMed

Publication Types