Display options
Share it on

Adv Pharmacol Sci. 2015;2015:521718. doi: 10.1155/2015/521718. Epub 2015 Aug 02.

Comparative Effect of Lisinopril and Fosinopril in Mitigating Learning and Memory Deficit in Scopolamine-Induced Amnesic Rats.

Advances in pharmacological sciences

Debasree Deb, K L Bairy, Veena Nayak, Mohandas Rao

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal Campus, Manipal 576104, India.
  2. Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal 576104, India.
  3. Department of Anatomy, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal University, Manipal Campus, Manipal 576104, India.

PMID: 26300914 PMCID: PMC4537708 DOI: 10.1155/2015/521718

Abstract

Lisinopril and fosinopril were compared on scopolamine-induced learning and memory deficits in rats. A total of eighty-four male Wistar rats were divided into seven groups. Group I received 2% gum acacia orally for 4 weeks, group II received normal saline, and group III received scopolamine (2 mg/kg/ip) as single dose. Groups IV and V received lisinopril ( 0.225 mg/kg and 0.45 mg/kg), while Groups VI and VII received fosinopril (0.90 mg/kg and 1.80 mg/kg), respectively, orally for four weeks, followed by scopolamine (2 mg/kg/ip) given 45 minutes prior to experimental procedure. Evaluation of learning and memory was assessed by using passive avoidance, Morris water maze, and elevated plus maze tests followed by analysis of hippocampal morphology and quantification of the number of surviving neurons. Scopolamine induced marked impairment of memory in behavioral tests which correlated with morphological changes in hippocampus. Pretreatment with fosinopril 1.80 mg/kg was found to significantly ameliorate the memory deficits and hippocampal degeneration induced by scopolamine. Fosinopril exhibits antiamnesic activity, indicating its possible role in preventing memory deficits seen in dementia though the precise mechanism underlying this effect needs to be further evaluated.

References

  1. Am J Hypertens. 1989 Apr;2(4):294-306 - PubMed
  2. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Aug;36(1):60-90 - PubMed
  3. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;640:241-4 - PubMed
  4. J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 8;27(32):8628-35 - PubMed
  5. Cardiovasc Res. 1999 Dec;44(3):579-87 - PubMed
  6. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;63(2):214-21 - PubMed
  7. Exp Ther Med. 2014 Aug;8(2):671-675 - PubMed
  8. Behav Neural Biol. 1986 Mar;45(2):196-211 - PubMed
  9. Pharmacotherapy. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):588-99 - PubMed
  10. J Neurosci Methods. 1984 May;11(1):47-60 - PubMed
  11. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;31(4):540-4 - PubMed
  12. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2005 Jan;2(1):29-35 - PubMed
  13. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;21(6):550-5 - PubMed
  14. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;90(2):274-5 - PubMed
  15. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Feb 21;374(3):222-6 - PubMed
  16. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19 Suppl 6:S63-71 - PubMed
  17. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Feb;6(2):67-77 - PubMed
  18. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1992 Jan;16(1):117-25 - PubMed
  19. Arch Neurol. 1974 Feb;30(2):113-21 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 1998 Apr 14;97(14):1411-20 - PubMed
  21. J Neurochem. 1983 Feb;40(2):503-9 - PubMed
  22. BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 25;3(7):null - PubMed
  23. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 13;169(13):1195-202 - PubMed
  24. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 May 21;318(1):187-91 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999 Nov 3;383(3):231-40 - PubMed
  26. Neurology. 2004 Oct 12;63(7):1324-5 - PubMed
  27. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2013 Jun;14(2):124-36 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Clin Invest. 1998 Nov;28(11):944-9 - PubMed
  29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12403-4 - PubMed

Publication Types