Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2015 Sep 22;3:e1259. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1259. eCollection 2015.

Metatranscriptomic analysis of a high-sulfide aquatic spring reveals insights into sulfur cycling and unexpected aerobic metabolism.

PeerJ

Anne M Spain, Mostafa S Elshahed, Fares Z Najar, Lee R Krumholz

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Ferris State University , Big Rapids, MI , United States ; Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology and the Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.
  2. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, OK , United States.
  3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Advanced Center for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.
  4. Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology and the Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.

PMID: 26417542 PMCID: PMC4582958 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1259

Abstract

Zodletone spring is a sulfide-rich spring in southwestern Oklahoma characterized by shallow, microoxic, light-exposed spring water overlaying anoxic sediments. Previously, culture-independent 16S rRNA gene based diversity surveys have revealed that Zodletone spring source sediments harbor a highly diverse microbial community, with multiple lineages putatively involved in various sulfur-cycling processes. Here, we conducted a metatranscriptomic survey of microbial populations in Zodletone spring source sediments to characterize the relative prevalence and importance of putative phototrophic, chemolithotrophic, and heterotrophic microorganisms in the sulfur cycle, the identity of lineages actively involved in various sulfur cycling processes, and the interaction between sulfur cycling and other geochemical processes at the spring source. Sediment samples at the spring's source were taken at three different times within a 24-h period for geochemical analyses and RNA sequencing. In depth mining of datasets for sulfur cycling transcripts revealed major sulfur cycling pathways and taxa involved, including an unexpected potential role of Actinobacteria in sulfide oxidation and thiosulfate transformation. Surprisingly, transcripts coding for the cyanobacterial Photosystem II D1 protein, methane monooxygenase, and terminal cytochrome oxidases were encountered, indicating that genes for oxygen production and aerobic modes of metabolism are actively being transcribed, despite below-detectable levels (<1 µM) of oxygen in source sediment. Results highlight transcripts involved in sulfur, methane, and oxygen cycles, propose that oxygenic photosynthesis could support aerobic methane and sulfide oxidation in anoxic sediments exposed to sunlight, and provide a viewpoint of microbial metabolic lifestyles under conditions similar to those seen during late Archaean and Proterozoic eons.

Keywords: Actinobacteria; Biodiversity; Metatranscriptomics; Methane oxidation; Microbial mats; Oxygenic photosynthesis; Sulfide oxidation; Sulfur cycle; Sulfur spring

References

  1. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Jan 23;116(1):109-11 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):98-103 - PubMed
  3. Res Microbiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;159(9-10):579-89 - PubMed
  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):408-17 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3805-10 - PubMed
  6. Genome Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1552-60 - PubMed
  7. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009 Apr;Chapter 18:Unit18.1 - PubMed
  8. ISME J. 2011 Mar;5(3):414-26 - PubMed
  9. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004 Nov 5;43(43):5736-63 - PubMed
  10. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Dec;68(4):669-85 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2009 Oct 30;326(5953):713-6 - PubMed
  12. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Sep;54(Pt 5):1477-82 - PubMed
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(5):1332-44 - PubMed
  14. PLoS One. 2008 Jun 25;3(6):e2527 - PubMed
  15. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;24(2):135-75 - PubMed
  16. J Mol Biol. 2000 May 12;298(4):691-704 - PubMed
  17. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(7):1573-8 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):739-43 - PubMed
  19. Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186-94 - PubMed
  20. Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;11(6):1358-75 - PubMed
  21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):398-407 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 1959 Sep;234:2325-6 - PubMed
  23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D623-31 - PubMed
  24. ISME J. 2012 Oct;6(10):1869-82 - PubMed
  25. IUBMB Life. 2007 Feb;59(2):51-9 - PubMed
  26. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998 Apr;48 Pt 2:441-9 - PubMed
  27. Trends Microbiol. 1999 Feb;7(2):88-92 - PubMed
  28. Geobiology. 2012 May;10(3):250-67 - PubMed
  29. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Sep;56(5-6):634-49 - PubMed
  30. J Bacteriol. 2008 Apr;190(7):2572-9 - PubMed
  31. J Bacteriol. 1995 Jun;177(11):3071-9 - PubMed
  32. Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;11(4):960-70 - PubMed
  33. ISME J. 2013 Apr;7(4):817-29 - PubMed
  34. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7 - PubMed
  35. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 26;5(8):e12414 - PubMed
  36. FEBS Lett. 1991 Jan 28;278(2):151-4 - PubMed
  37. Chem Rev. 2007 Oct;107(10):4206-72 - PubMed
  38. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4121-6 - PubMed
  39. Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;16(1):304-17 - PubMed
  40. Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):543-8 - PubMed
  41. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1831-8 - PubMed
  42. ISME J. 2013 Oct;7(10):1962-73 - PubMed
  43. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 19;9:386 - PubMed
  44. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;69(9):5609-21 - PubMed
  45. J Bacteriol. 1971 May;106(2):603-7 - PubMed
  46. ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):622-34 - PubMed
  47. Geobiology. 2011 Mar;9(2):166-79 - PubMed
  48. ISME J. 2011 Aug;5(8):1279-90 - PubMed
  49. J Biol Chem. 1998 Apr 3;273(14):7957-66 - PubMed
  50. J Biochem. 1985 Apr;97(4):1025-32 - PubMed
  51. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Mar;19(3):1720-30 - PubMed
  52. Extremophiles. 2011 Mar;15(2):155-63 - PubMed
  53. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Apr;70(4):2230-9 - PubMed
  54. ISME J. 2012 Dec;6(12):2257-68 - PubMed
  55. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 - PubMed
  56. J Bacteriol. 1975 Sep;123(3):855-61 - PubMed

Publication Types