PeerJ. 2015 Sep 22;3:e1259. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1259. eCollection 2015.
Metatranscriptomic analysis of a high-sulfide aquatic spring reveals insights into sulfur cycling and unexpected aerobic metabolism.
PeerJ
Anne M Spain, Mostafa S Elshahed, Fares Z Najar, Lee R Krumholz
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Biological Sciences, Ferris State University , Big Rapids, MI , United States ; Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology and the Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, OK , United States.
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and the Advanced Center for Genome Technology, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology and the Institute for Energy and the Environment, University of Oklahoma , Norman, OK , United States.
PMID: 26417542
PMCID: PMC4582958 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1259
Abstract
Zodletone spring is a sulfide-rich spring in southwestern Oklahoma characterized by shallow, microoxic, light-exposed spring water overlaying anoxic sediments. Previously, culture-independent 16S rRNA gene based diversity surveys have revealed that Zodletone spring source sediments harbor a highly diverse microbial community, with multiple lineages putatively involved in various sulfur-cycling processes. Here, we conducted a metatranscriptomic survey of microbial populations in Zodletone spring source sediments to characterize the relative prevalence and importance of putative phototrophic, chemolithotrophic, and heterotrophic microorganisms in the sulfur cycle, the identity of lineages actively involved in various sulfur cycling processes, and the interaction between sulfur cycling and other geochemical processes at the spring source. Sediment samples at the spring's source were taken at three different times within a 24-h period for geochemical analyses and RNA sequencing. In depth mining of datasets for sulfur cycling transcripts revealed major sulfur cycling pathways and taxa involved, including an unexpected potential role of Actinobacteria in sulfide oxidation and thiosulfate transformation. Surprisingly, transcripts coding for the cyanobacterial Photosystem II D1 protein, methane monooxygenase, and terminal cytochrome oxidases were encountered, indicating that genes for oxygen production and aerobic modes of metabolism are actively being transcribed, despite below-detectable levels (<1 µM) of oxygen in source sediment. Results highlight transcripts involved in sulfur, methane, and oxygen cycles, propose that oxygenic photosynthesis could support aerobic methane and sulfide oxidation in anoxic sediments exposed to sunlight, and provide a viewpoint of microbial metabolic lifestyles under conditions similar to those seen during late Archaean and Proterozoic eons.
Keywords: Actinobacteria; Biodiversity; Metatranscriptomics; Methane oxidation; Microbial mats; Oxygenic photosynthesis; Sulfide oxidation; Sulfur cycle; Sulfur spring
References
- Arch Microbiol. 1978 Jan 23;116(1):109-11 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):98-103 - PubMed
- Res Microbiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;159(9-10):579-89 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):408-17 - PubMed
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3805-10 - PubMed
- Genome Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1552-60 - PubMed
- Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009 Apr;Chapter 18:Unit18.1 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2011 Mar;5(3):414-26 - PubMed
- Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2004 Nov 5;43(43):5736-63 - PubMed
- Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Dec;68(4):669-85 - PubMed
- Science. 2009 Oct 30;326(5953):713-6 - PubMed
- Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004 Sep;54(Pt 5):1477-82 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(5):1332-44 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2008 Jun 25;3(6):e2527 - PubMed
- FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000 Apr;24(2):135-75 - PubMed
- J Mol Biol. 2000 May 12;298(4):691-704 - PubMed
- J Exp Bot. 2006;57(7):1573-8 - PubMed
- Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):739-43 - PubMed
- Genome Res. 1998 Mar;8(3):186-94 - PubMed
- Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;11(6):1358-75 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Feb;51(2):398-407 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1959 Sep;234:2325-6 - PubMed
- Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jan;36(Database issue):D623-31 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2012 Oct;6(10):1869-82 - PubMed
- IUBMB Life. 2007 Feb;59(2):51-9 - PubMed
- Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998 Apr;48 Pt 2:441-9 - PubMed
- Trends Microbiol. 1999 Feb;7(2):88-92 - PubMed
- Geobiology. 2012 May;10(3):250-67 - PubMed
- Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Sep;56(5-6):634-49 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 2008 Apr;190(7):2572-9 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1995 Jun;177(11):3071-9 - PubMed
- Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;11(4):960-70 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2013 Apr;7(4):817-29 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2010 Aug 26;5(8):e12414 - PubMed
- FEBS Lett. 1991 Jan 28;278(2):151-4 - PubMed
- Chem Rev. 2007 Oct;107(10):4206-72 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jul;71(7):4121-6 - PubMed
- Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;16(1):304-17 - PubMed
- Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):543-8 - PubMed
- Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1831-8 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2013 Oct;7(10):1962-73 - PubMed
- BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 19;9:386 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;69(9):5609-21 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1971 May;106(2):603-7 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):622-34 - PubMed
- Geobiology. 2011 Mar;9(2):166-79 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2011 Aug;5(8):1279-90 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1998 Apr 3;273(14):7957-66 - PubMed
- J Biochem. 1985 Apr;97(4):1025-32 - PubMed
- Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Mar;19(3):1720-30 - PubMed
- Extremophiles. 2011 Mar;15(2):155-63 - PubMed
- Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Apr;70(4):2230-9 - PubMed
- ISME J. 2012 Dec;6(12):2257-68 - PubMed
- Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1975 Sep;123(3):855-61 - PubMed
Publication Types