Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Sep 01;11:1325-35. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S89678. eCollection 2015.
Efficacy of biological agents administered as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison analysis.
Therapeutics and clinical risk management
Alberto Migliore, Emanuele Bizzi, Colin Gerard Egan, Mauro Bernardi, Lea Petrella
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Rheumatology Unit, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- Primula Multimedia SRL, Pisa, Italy.
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
- MEMOTEF Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
PMID: 26366085
PMCID: PMC4562742 DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S89678
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biological agents provide an important therapeutic alternative for rheumatoid arthritis patients refractory to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Few head-to-head comparative trials are available.
PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the relative efficacy of different biologic agents indicated for use as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS: A systemic literature search was performed on electronic databases to identify articles reporting double-blind randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of biologic agents indicated for monotherapy. Efficacy was assessed using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50, and 70 criteria at 16-24 weeks. Relative efficacy was estimated using Bayesian mixed-treatment comparison models. Outcome measures were expressed as odds ratio and 95% credible intervals.
RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials were selected for data extraction and analysis. Mixed-treatment comparison analysis revealed that tocilizumab offered 100% probability of being the best treatment for inducing an ACR20 response versus placebo, methotrexate, adalimumab, or etanercept. Likewise, for ACR50 and ACR70 outcome responses, tocilizumab had a 99.8% or 98.7% probability of being the best treatment, respectively, compared to other treatments or placebo. Tocilizumab increased the relative probability of being the best treatment (vs methotrexate) by 3.2-fold (odds ratio: 2.1-3.89) for all ACR outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab offered the greatest possibility of obtaining an ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 outcome vs other monotherapies or placebo.
Keywords: biologics; meta-analysis; mixed-treatment comparison; monotherapy; rheumatoid arthritis; tocilizumab
References
- Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):478-86 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1586-93 - PubMed
- Stat Methods Med Res. 2001 Aug;10(4):277-303 - PubMed
- J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2002 Jun;29(3):271-307 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2004 Feb 28;363(9410):675-81 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 May;63(5):508-16 - PubMed
- Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2 Suppl 1):1-12 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):897-900 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jan;54(1):26-37 - PubMed
- Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R66 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 2007 Mar 15;26(6):1237-54 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Sep;54(9):2817-29 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Oct;66(10):1339-44 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Mar 15;57(2):193-202 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Sep;66(9):1162-7 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):15-25 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb 15;59(2):234-40 - PubMed
- Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(2):77-85 - PubMed
- Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(1):12-9 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jul;68(7):1100-4 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):746-58 - PubMed
- Am J Epidemiol. 2009 May 1;169(9):1158-65 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):88-96 - PubMed
- J Rheumatol. 2009 Aug;36(8):1611-7 - PubMed
- Rheumatol Int. 2010 Sep;30(11):1441-8 - PubMed
- Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Jun;39(6):425-41 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Feb;70(2):266-71 - PubMed
- Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jan;50(1):222-9 - PubMed
- Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jan;31(1):39-51 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 May;70(5):755-9 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD008794 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Apr;70(4):583-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Jun;37(3):301-7 - PubMed
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1885-97 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Feb;71(2):225-30 - PubMed
- J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):340-51 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30275 - PubMed
- J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):576-85 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72(4):583-9 - PubMed
- Biologics. 2012;6:429-64 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2013 May 4;381(9877):1541-50 - PubMed
- Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Oct;29(10):1213-22 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):492-509 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):516-28 - PubMed
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Mar;73(3):529-35 - PubMed
- Biologics. 2014 Apr 07;8:141-53 - PubMed
- Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jul 03;12:102 - PubMed
- Rheumatol Ther. 2015 Jun;2(1):85-96 - PubMed
- Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Jun;38(6):727-35 - PubMed
Publication Types