Display options
Cite
Theeke LA, Mallow JA, Barnes ER, et al. The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness. Open J Nurs. 2015;5(5):416-425doi: 10.4236/ojn.2015.55045.
Theeke, L. A., Mallow, J. A., Barnes, E. R., & Theeke, E. (2015). The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness. Open journal of nursing, 5(5), 416-425. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.55045
Theeke, Laurie A, et al. "The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness." Open journal of nursing vol. 5,5 (2015): 416-425. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.55045
Theeke LA, Mallow JA, Barnes ER, Theeke E. The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness. Open J Nurs. 2015 May 01;5(5):416-425. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2015.55045. PMID: 26401420; PMCID: PMC4577056.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Open J Nurs. 2015 May 01;5(5):416-425. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2015.55045.

The Feasibility and Acceptability of LISTEN for Loneliness.

Open journal of nursing

Laurie A Theeke, Jennifer A Mallow, Emily R Barnes, Elliott Theeke

Affiliations

  1. Department of Adult Health, School of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.

PMID: 26401420 PMCID: PMC4577056 DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2015.55045

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to present the initial feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN (Loneliness Intervention using Story Theory to Enhance Nursing-sensitive outcomes), a new intervention for loneliness. Loneliness is a significant stressor and known contributor to multiple chronic health conditions in varied populations. In addition, loneliness is reported as predictive of functional decline and mortality in large samples of older adults from multiple cultures. Currently, there are no standard therapies recommended as effective treatments for loneliness. The paucity of interventions has limited the ability of healthcare providers to translate what we know about the problem of loneliness to active planning of clinical care that results in diminished loneliness. LISTEN was developed using the process for complex intervention development suggested by the Medical Research Council (MRC) [1] [2].

METHODS: Feasibility and acceptability of LISTEN were evaluated as the first objective of a longitudinal randomized trial which was set in a university based family medicine center in a rural southeastern community in Appalachia. Twenty-seven older adults [(24 women and 3 men, mean age: 75 (SD 7.50)] who were lonely, community-dwelling, and experiencing chronic illness, participated. Feasibility was evaluated by tracking recruitment efforts, enrollment, attendance to intervention sessions, attrition, and with feedback evaluations from study personnel. Acceptability was assessed using quantitative and qualitative evaluation data from participants.

RESULTS: LISTEN was evaluated as feasible to deliver with no attrition and near perfect attendance. Participants ranked LISTEN as highly acceptable for diminishing loneliness with participants requesting a continuation of the program or development of additional sessions.

CONCLUSIONS: LISTEN is feasible to deliver in a primary healthcare setting and has the potential to diminish loneliness which could result in improvement of the long-term negative known sequelae of loneliness such as hypertension, depression, functional decline, and mortality. Feedback from study participants is being used to inform future trials of LISTEN with consideration for developing additional sessions. Longitudinal randomized trials are needed in varied populations to assess long-term health and healthcare system benefits of diminishing loneliness, and to assess the potential scalability of LISTEN as a reimbursable treatment for loneliness.

Keywords: Feasibility; LISTEN; Loneliness

References

  1. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):140-51 - PubMed
  2. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Aug;42(6):871-83 - PubMed
  3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004853 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Sep;22(17-18):2366-86 - PubMed
  5. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Sep;37(4):142-6 - PubMed
  6. J Adolesc Health. 2011 Sep;49(3):278-86 - PubMed
  7. J Neurosci Nurs. 2014 Dec;46(6):E3-15 - PubMed
  8. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):238-49 - PubMed
  9. AIDS Care. 2010 May;22(5):630-9 - PubMed
  10. Aging Ment Health. 2006 Sep;10(5):467-75 - PubMed
  11. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;15(3):219-66 - PubMed
  12. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):67-71 - PubMed
  13. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Apr;35(3):430-41 - PubMed
  14. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;48(1):5-13 - PubMed
  15. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2003;57(4):313-37 - PubMed
  16. Health Psychol. 2010 Sep;29(5):550-4 - PubMed
  17. Online J Rural Nurs Health Care. 2014;14(1):43-65 - PubMed
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92 - PubMed
  19. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Mar;74(6):907-14 - PubMed
  20. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):19-29 - PubMed
  21. Open J Nurs. 2015 Feb;5(2):136-143 - PubMed
  22. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010 Apr;3(2):113-25 - PubMed
  23. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1989;10(2):149-67 - PubMed
  24. Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Feb;19(1):16-21 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Dec;13(6):494-505 - PubMed
  26. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655 - PubMed
  27. Aging Ment Health. 2007 Sep;11(5):477-84 - PubMed
  28. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003 Winter;9(4):65-81 - PubMed
  29. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Aug;38(4):185-203 - PubMed
  30. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005 Dec;4(4):274-86 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(6):818-24 - PubMed
  32. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2012 Jun;26(3):214-24 - PubMed
  33. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1078-83 - PubMed
  34. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Jul;26(6):591-609 - PubMed
  35. Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):407-17 - PubMed
  36. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015 May;27(5):256-61 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support