Display options
Share it on

Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):751-6. doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.7240.

Comparison of microcoils and polyvinyl alcohol particles in selective microcatheter angioembolization of non variceal acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Pakistan journal of medical sciences

Tanveer-Ul-Haq, Muhammad Idris, Basit Salam, Waseem Akhtar, Yasir Jamil

Affiliations

  1. Dr. Tanveer-Ul-Haq, FRCR, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, 74800 Karachi, Pakistan.
  2. Dr. Muhammad Idris, FCPS, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, 74800 Karachi, Pakistan.
  3. Dr. Basit Salam, FCPS, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, 74800 Karachi, Pakistan.
  4. Dr. Waseem Akhtar, FCPS, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, 74800 Karachi, Pakistan.
  5. Dr. Yasir Jamil, FCPS, Department of Radiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, 74800 Karachi, Pakistan.

PMID: 26430397 PMCID: PMC4590394 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.314.7240

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles with microcoils in angiembolisation of non variceal acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who underwent transcatheter angioembolization from January, 1995 to December, 2013 at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. Patients were divided into two groups on basis of use of either microcoils or PVA particles and compared in terms of technical success, clinical success, re-bleeding and ischemic complication rates. Chi (χ(2)) square and Fisher's exact tests were applied and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: Fifty seven patients underwent angioembolization. Microcoil and PVA particles embolization was performed in 63% (36/57) and 35% (20/57) cases respectively. Technical success was achieved in all cases (100%). Clinical success rate was higher in microcoils group (92%) than PVA particles group (75%) with statistically significant P value (p=0.048). Ischemic complication was seen in one case (3%) in the microcoil group, while no such complications were seen in the PVA particles group.

CONCLUSION: In angioembolization of non variceal acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage microcoils are better than Polyvinyl alcohol particles with higher clinical success and lower re-bleed rates.

Keywords: Angio-embolization; Comparison; Gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Microcoils; Polyvinyl alcohol particles

References

  1. Arch Surg. 2008 May;143(5):457-61 - PubMed
  2. Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):857-67 - PubMed
  3. Korean J Radiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;10 (4):391-7 - PubMed
  4. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Dec;12 (12 ):1399-405 - PubMed
  5. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 May;11(5):601-6 - PubMed
  6. Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):436-45 - PubMed
  7. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;26(3):184-96 - PubMed
  8. Am J Surg. 1997 Jul;174(1):24-8 - PubMed
  9. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):419-24 - PubMed
  10. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Oct;177(4):829-36 - PubMed
  11. Dan Med Bull. 2010 Mar;57(3):A4138 - PubMed
  12. Radiology. 2001 Mar;218(3):739-48 - PubMed
  13. Med Clin North Am. 2000 Sep;84(5):1183-208 - PubMed
  14. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 May;15(5):447-50 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;24(2):155-63 - PubMed
  16. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Feb;49(2):228-38 - PubMed
  17. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Dec;48(6):606-17 - PubMed
  18. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-58 - PubMed
  19. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Sep;159(3):521-6 - PubMed
  20. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Sep;53(9):1258-64 - PubMed
  21. Australas Radiol. 2004 Sep;48(3):311-7 - PubMed
  22. Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):539-44; discussion 544-5 - PubMed
  23. Australas Radiol. 2006 Feb;50(1):21-6 - PubMed
  24. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jun;96(6):1782-5 - PubMed

Publication Types