Display options
Share it on

Insights Imaging. 2015 Dec;6(6):579-90. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0435-8. Epub 2015 Oct 02.

Imaging of lumbar spinal surgery complications.

Insights into imaging

Ajay Malhotra, Vivek B Kalra, Xiao Wu, Ryan Grant, Richard A Bronen, Khalid M Abbed

Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Box 208042, Tompkins East 2, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA. [email protected].
  2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Box 208042, Tompkins East 2, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA. [email protected].
  3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Box 208042, Tompkins East 2, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA. [email protected].
  4. Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. [email protected].
  5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, Box 208042, Tompkins East 2, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520-8042, USA. [email protected].
  6. Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 26432098 PMCID: PMC4656239 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-015-0435-8

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Lumbar spine surgery for spinal stenosis is a frequently performed procedure and was the fastest growing type of surgery in the US from 1980 to 2000. With increasing surgical invasiveness, postoperative complications also tend to be higher. Cross-sectional imaging techniques (CT and MRI) are more sensitive than radiographs and play an increasingly important role in evaluation of patients with lumbar spine surgery. Their use in patients with metallic implants is somewhat limited by artefacts, which can obscure pathology and decrease accuracy and reader confidence. Metal artefact reduction techniques have been developed, which can significantly improve image quality and enable early detection of postoperative complications. Complications can occur throughout postoperative course. Early complications include hardware displacement, incidental durotomy, postoperative collections-most commonly seroma, and less likely haematoma and/or infection. Incidental durotomy with CSF leak causing intracranial hypotension has characteristic MR brain findings and diagnosis of occult leak sites have been improved with use of dynamic CT myelography. Haematomas, even when compressing the thecal sac, are usually asymptomatic. Early infection, with nonspecific MR findings, can be diagnosed accurately using dual radiotracer studies. Delayed complications include loosening, hardware failure, symptomatic new or recurrent disc herniation, peri-/epidural fibrosis, arachnoiditis, and radiculitis.

TEACHING POINTS: • CT and MRI play an increasingly important role in evaluation of patients with lumbar spine surgery • Complications can occur throughout the postoperative course and early detection is critical • Artefact reduction techniques can improve image quality for early and improved detection of complications.

Keywords: Artefact; CT; Complications; Lumbar spinal surgeries; MR

References

  1. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Dec;25(6):523-35 - PubMed
  2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Feb;20(2):196-203 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):113-22 - PubMed
  4. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jan;16(1):27-31 - PubMed
  5. World J Radiol. 2012 May 28;4(5):193-207 - PubMed
  6. Eur Spine J. 2012 Oct;21(10):2091-6 - PubMed
  7. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Mar;164(3):665-71 - PubMed
  8. Nucl Med Commun. 2013 Oct;34(10 ):964-70 - PubMed
  9. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 May-Jun;10 (3):399-400 - PubMed
  10. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012 Jul;50(4):731-47 - PubMed
  11. World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):939-41 - PubMed
  12. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Sep;15(3):280-4 - PubMed
  13. Eur Spine J. 2010 Aug;19(8):1262-80 - PubMed
  14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):480-6 - PubMed
  15. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Aug;22(7):1233-4 - PubMed
  16. Eur Spine J. 2005 Apr;14 (3):287-90 - PubMed
  17. Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1331-40 - PubMed
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:27-33 - PubMed
  19. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 Nov;21(4):659-77 - PubMed
  20. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 May;53(3):531-47 - PubMed
  21. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Nov 15;37(24):2017-33 - PubMed
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Nov;81(11):1519-28 - PubMed
  23. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Aug;15(2):202-5 - PubMed
  24. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(12):1101-7 - PubMed
  25. Neuroradiology. 1996 May;38 Suppl 1:S90-6 - PubMed
  26. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W128-33 - PubMed
  27. Neuroradiology. 2002 Sep;44(9):723-39 - PubMed
  28. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 1;36(7):556-63 - PubMed
  29. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1785-9 - PubMed
  30. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):18-24 - PubMed
  31. JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65 - PubMed
  32. Asian Spine J. 2012 Sep;6(3):157-62 - PubMed
  33. Radiographics. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):775-89 - PubMed
  34. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):108-13 - PubMed
  35. Radiographics. 2006 Oct;26 Suppl 1:S97-110 - PubMed
  36. Neurosurgery. 1996 Apr;38(4):855-61; discussion 861-3 - PubMed
  37. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006 Mar;10(1):98-106 - PubMed
  38. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1 Suppl):60-4 - PubMed
  39. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;33(3):535-40 - PubMed
  40. Radiographics. 1993 Jul;13(4):797-816 - PubMed
  41. Int Orthop. 2012 Feb;36(2):451-6 - PubMed
  42. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S66-75 - PubMed
  43. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb;443:139-46 - PubMed
  44. Eur Spine J. 2000 Jun;9(3):218-23 - PubMed
  45. Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Dec 15;15(6):E6 - PubMed
  46. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2147-51 - PubMed
  47. Neuroradiology. 2008 Dec;50(12):1025-34 - PubMed
  48. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2707-14 - PubMed
  49. Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6):1044-9; discussion 1049 - PubMed
  50. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014 May;24(2):305-26 - PubMed
  51. Semin Nucl Med. 1997 Oct;27(4):334-45 - PubMed
  52. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):690-4 - PubMed

Publication Types