Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 26;6:1276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01276. eCollection 2015.

Emotional expressions of old faces are perceived as more positive and less negative than young faces in young adults.

Frontiers in psychology

Norah C Hass, Erik J S Schneider, Seung-Lark Lim

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City , Kansas City, MO, USA.

PMID: 26379599 PMCID: PMC4549556 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01276

Abstract

Interpreting the emotions of others through their facial expressions can provide important social information, yet the way in which we judge an emotion is subject to psychosocial factors. We hypothesized that the age of a face would bias how the emotional expressions are judged, with older faces generally more likely to be viewed as having more positive and less negative expressions than younger faces. Using two-alternative forced-choice perceptual decision tasks, participants sorted young and old faces of which emotional expressions were gradually morphed into one of two categories-"neutral vs. happy" and "neutral vs. angry." The results indicated that old faces were more frequently perceived as having a happy expression at the lower emotional intensity levels, and less frequently perceived as having an angry expression at the higher emotional intensity levels than younger faces in young adults. Critically, the perceptual decision threshold at which old faces were judged as happy was lower than for young faces, and higher for angry old faces compared to young faces. These findings suggest that the age of the face influences how its emotional expression is interpreted in social interactions.

Keywords: age; emotions; facial expressions; facial perception; perceptual decision

References

  1. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Jan;62(1):P53-60 - PubMed
  2. Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):128-33 - PubMed
  3. Vision Res. 1990;30(1):1-10 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8 - PubMed
  5. J Vis. 2013 Feb 08;13(2):12 - PubMed
  6. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:611-47 - PubMed
  7. Mem Cognit. 1991 May;19(3):229-38 - PubMed
  8. Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 10;6:417 - PubMed
  9. Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep;25(6):983-97 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Aging. 2002 Sep;17(3):482-95 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0131472 - PubMed
  12. Emotion. 2012 Aug;12(4):726-36 - PubMed
  13. Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):329-39 - PubMed
  14. Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 20;4:63 - PubMed
  15. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 11;3:223 - PubMed
  16. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):292-302 - PubMed
  17. Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1201-12 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32987 - PubMed
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Dec;99(6):964-77 - PubMed
  20. Neuroimage. 2013 Sep;78:363-71 - PubMed
  21. Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):514-23 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):265-77 - PubMed
  23. Emotion. 2008 Feb;8(1):96-103 - PubMed
  24. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111074 - PubMed
  25. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):130-6 - PubMed
  26. Gerontologist. 1984 Aug;24(4):408-14 - PubMed
  27. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(4):863-81 - PubMed
  28. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Jul;48(1):217-37 - PubMed
  29. Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 04;5:30 - PubMed
  30. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):351-62 - PubMed
  31. Exp Aging Res. 2004 Oct-Dec;30(4):305-31 - PubMed
  32. Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep;25(6):968-82 - PubMed
  33. Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):619-30 - PubMed
  34. Psychol Aging. 1988 Sep;3(3):233-44 - PubMed
  35. Exp Psychol. 2010;57(5):390-7 - PubMed
  36. Psychiatry Res. 2012 May 30;197(3):217-20 - PubMed
  37. Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):640-3 - PubMed
  38. Neuroimage. 2005 Oct 15;28(1):249-55 - PubMed
  39. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov 1;48(6):1377-1380 - PubMed
  40. Exp Aging Res. 2011 Oct;37(5):503-15 - PubMed

Publication Types