Display options
Cite
Bansal R, Bansal T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):ZC11-4doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278.
Bansal, R., & Bansal, T. (2015). A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 9(8), ZC11-4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278
Bansal, Ruchika, and Bansal, Tajinder. "A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study." Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR vol. 9,8 (2015): ZC11-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278
Bansal R, Bansal T. A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC11-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278. Epub 2015 Aug 01. PMID: 26436037; PMCID: PMC4576631.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC11-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278. Epub 2015 Aug 01.

A Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Fluoride Release and Re-Release after Recharging from Aesthetic Restorative Materials: An in vitro Study.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Ruchika Bansal, Tajinder Bansal

Affiliations

  1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College , Barwala, Panchkula, India .
  2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Swami Devi Dyal Hospital and Dental College , Barwala, Panchkula, India .

PMID: 26436037 PMCID: PMC4576631 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11926.6278

Abstract

AIM: To measure the amount of fluoride released and re released after recharging from various restorative materials: Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji II), Light Cure Resin Modified GIC (Fuji II LC), Giomer (Beautifil II), Compomer (Dyract).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen cylindrical specimens were prepared from each material. The specimens were immersed in 20 ml of deionized water. The amount of released fluoride was measured during the 1(st) day, 7(th) day and on the day15 by using specific fluoride electrode and an ion-analyser. After 15 days each material was divided into three Sub Groups of five samples each. Sub Group A served as control, Sub Group B was exposed to 2% NaF solution, Sub Group C to 1000ppm F toothpaste. The amount of fluoride re-released was measured during the 1(st) day, 7(th) day and on the day15 by using specific fluoride electrode and an ion-analyser. The results were statistically analysed using analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Tukey Kramer multiple comparison tests (p≤0.05).

RESULTS: Independent of the observation time period of the study the Conventional GIC released the highest amount of fluoride followed by RMGIC, Giomer and Compomer. The initial burst effect was seen with GIC'S but not with Giomer and Compomer. After topical fluoride application fluoride re release was highest in Sub Group B and GIC had a greater recharging ability followed by RMGIC, Giomer and Compomer. The fluoride re release was greatest on 1(st) day followed by rapid return to near exposure levels.

CONCLUSION: From the study it was concluded that, the initial Fluoride release was highest from Conventional GIC followed by Resin Modified GIC, Giomer and Compomer. The Fluoride re release was high when recharging with professional regime (2% NaF) as compared to home regime (Toothpaste). Conventional GIC had a greater recharging ability followed by Resin Modified GIC, Giomer and Compomer.

Keywords: Fluoridated dentrifices; Fluoride releasing materials; Fluoride uptake; Fluorides

References

  1. Dent Mater. 1998 Nov;14(6):441-7 - PubMed
  2. Dent Mater. 1993 Nov;9(6):350-4 - PubMed
  3. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jan;28(1):26-32 - PubMed
  4. Dent Clin North Am. 2002 Apr;46(2):247-76, vi - PubMed
  5. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):156-64 - PubMed
  6. J Dent Res. 1999 Oct;78(10):1647-54 - PubMed
  7. Oper Dent. 2003 Mar-Apr;28(2):178-85 - PubMed
  8. Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):96-101 - PubMed
  9. J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):591-7 - PubMed
  10. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):27-32 - PubMed
  11. Oper Dent. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):259-65 - PubMed
  12. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009 Fall;6(2):75-81 - PubMed
  13. Am J Dent. 2006 Apr;19(2):123-7 - PubMed
  14. J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Oct;15(5):406-11 - PubMed
  15. Biomaterials. 1998 Mar;19(6):503-8 - PubMed
  16. Dent Mater. 2004 Nov;20(9):789-95 - PubMed
  17. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 May;26(5):388-93 - PubMed
  18. Dent Mater. 1993 May;9(3):151-4 - PubMed
  19. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):343-62 - PubMed

Publication Types