Display options
Share it on

Mol Cytogenet. 2015 Oct 17;8:78. doi: 10.1186/s13039-015-0181-0. eCollection 2015.

Epidermal Growth Factor (EGFR) copy number aberrations in esophageal and gastro-esophageal junctional carcinoma.

Molecular cytogenetics

Åsa Dahle-Smith, David Stevenson, Doreen Massie, Graeme I Murray, Susan J Dutton, Corran Roberts, David Ferry, Aileen Osborne, Caroline Clark, Russell D Petty, Zosia Miedzybrodzka

Affiliations

  1. Division of Applied Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.
  2. Department of Medical Genetics, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.
  3. Department of Pathology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.
  4. Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK.
  5. Eli Lilly and Company, 440 Route 22 East, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 USA.
  6. Department of Medical Genetics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK.

PMID: 26478746 PMCID: PMC4609119 DOI: 10.1186/s13039-015-0181-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in esophageal carcinoma (EC) have indicated a minority subgroup responsive to anti-EGFR therapies. Other investigations suggest increases in EGFR copy number are associated with poor prognosis in EC, but have used a variety of different techniques and tested numbers remain small. A validated assay for EGFR copy number in EC is needed, to allow investigation of EGFR copy number gain as a predictive biomarker for the anti-EGFR responsive subgroup of patients. We developed a scoring system in EC based upon established systems for EGFR fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) in lung cancer, and applied this in a series of 160 UK patients with advanced EC.

RESULTS: Dual colour FISH on formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) biopsies were scored independently by two operators as: disomy (score = 1), low trisomy (score = 2), high trisomy (score = 3), low polysomy (score = 4), high polysomy (score = 5) and amplification (score = 6). EGFR FISH positive cases (scores 5 and 6) were found in 32/160 (20 %) tumours, with high polysomy in 22 (13.8 %) and amplification in 10 (6.3 %). Two independent operator scores for FISH positivity were 100 % concordant. EGFR FISH positive status was not associated with clinic-pathological features. EGFR amplification was associated with worse survival (HR = 2.64, 95 % CI 1.04 to 6.71, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION: Our FISH scoring system for EGFR in advanced EC identifies a significant subgroup (20.0 %) of FISH positive patients. EGFR amplification, which is found in 6.3 %, is associated with poor survival. It is not known if there is a role for EGFR targeted treatment in this subgroup of patients, however we are now utilising this EGFR FISH assay and scoring system in biopsies from clinical trials utilising anti-EGFR targeted therapies.

Keywords: EGFR Copy Number; Esophageal Carcinoma; Esophago-gastric junctional carcinoma

References

  1. Lung Cancer. 2013 Mar;79(3):221-7 - PubMed
  2. Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 15;9(13):4819-25 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):36-46 - PubMed
  4. Cancer. 1994 Aug 1;74(3):795-804 - PubMed
  5. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Apr;133(4):611-2 - PubMed
  6. Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;141(2):160-71 - PubMed
  7. Diagn Pathol. 2006 Aug 15;1:19 - PubMed
  8. Int J Oncol. 2013 Apr;42(4):1151-8 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4709-14 - PubMed
  10. Int J Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;118(5):1173-80 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3798-807 - PubMed
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14 (6):481-9 - PubMed
  13. Histopathology. 2010 Sep;57(3):418-26 - PubMed
  14. Nat Genet. 2013 May;45(5):478-86 - PubMed
  15. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jun;12 (6):594-603 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Apr 1;24(10):1612-9 - PubMed
  17. Gut. 2013 Oct;62(10):1406-14 - PubMed
  18. Semin Oncol. 2004 Aug;31(4):450-64 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Mar;46(4):765-81 - PubMed
  20. Exp Cell Res. 2003 Mar 10;284(1):31-53 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99590 - PubMed
  22. Gene. 2006 Jan 17;366(1):2-16 - PubMed
  23. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jul;15(8):894-904 - PubMed
  24. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5007-18 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Apr;67(4):307-12 - PubMed
  26. Mol Cytogenet. 2011 Jun 20;4(1):14 - PubMed
  27. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32 - PubMed
  28. Br J Cancer. 1991 Jul;64(1):79-83 - PubMed
  29. J Clin Pathol. 2009 Nov;62(11):970-7 - PubMed
  30. Int J Cancer. 2002 Jun 20;99(6):860-8 - PubMed
  31. Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):490-9 - PubMed
  32. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;36(6):505-12 - PubMed
  33. Gut. 2012 May;61(5):673-84 - PubMed
  34. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb;131(2):111-9 - PubMed
  35. Hum Pathol. 2014 Apr;45(4):725-34 - PubMed
  36. Gut. 2012 May;61(5):638-40 - PubMed
  37. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):947-57 - PubMed
  38. J Clin Pathol. 2009 Apr;62(4):314-24 - PubMed
  39. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97 - PubMed
  40. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):744-52 - PubMed
  41. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Aug;1773(8):1263-84 - PubMed

Publication Types