Display options
Cite
Boushehri E, Soltani Arabshahi K, Monajemi A. Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29:222
Boushehri, E., Soltani Arabshahi, K., & Monajemi, A. (2015). Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 29222.
Boushehri, Elham, et al. "Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions." Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran vol. 29 (2015): 222.
Boushehri E, Soltani Arabshahi K, Monajemi A. Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Jun 15;29:222. eCollection 2015. PMID: 26478880; PMCID: PMC4606956.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Jun 15;29:222. eCollection 2015.

Clinical reasoning assessment through medical expertise theories: past, present and future directions.

Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Elham Boushehri, Kamran Soltani Arabshahi, Alireza Monajemi

Affiliations

  1. PhD candidate of Medical Education at Iran University of Medical Science, Faculty of Health, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. [email protected].
  2. MD, Professor, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  3. MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Science, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].

PMID: 26478880 PMCID: PMC4606956

Abstract

Exploration into the concept of "medical expert" dates back to more than 50 years ago, yet yielding three leading theories in the area of clinical reasoning, namely, knowledge structure, hypotheticdeductive, and dual process. Each theory defines "medical expert" in a dissimilar way. Therefore, the methods of assessment through which the experts are identified have been changed during the time. In this paper, we tried to categorize and introduce some widely used tests for identification of experts within the framework of existing main theories. Implementation of the proposed categorization for providing future assessment tools is discussed.

Keywords: Analytical approach; Assessment; Clinical reasoning; Experts; Non-analytical approach

References

  1. Acad Med. 1990 Oct;65(10):611-21 - PubMed
  2. Med Educ. 1981 Jan;15(1):26-32 - PubMed
  3. Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):450-5 - PubMed
  4. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 May;36(3):272-3 - PubMed
  5. Teach Learn Med. 2010 Jul;22(3):180-6 - PubMed
  6. Med Educ. 1977 Sep;11(5):329-34 - PubMed
  7. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R19 - PubMed
  8. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67 - PubMed
  9. Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):410-7 - PubMed
  10. Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1302-8 - PubMed
  11. Med Educ Online. 2011 Mar 14;16:null - PubMed
  12. Med Educ. 1987 Mar;21(2):86-91 - PubMed
  13. Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10 Suppl):S127-35 - PubMed
  14. Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):248-51 - PubMed
  15. Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):442-8 - PubMed
  16. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1998;3(1):51-58 - PubMed
  17. Acad Med. 1995 Apr;70(4):276-81 - PubMed
  18. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):787-94 - PubMed
  19. Acad Med. 1995 Mar;70(3):194-201 - PubMed
  20. Assist Technol. 2005 Fall;17(2):122-32 - PubMed
  21. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005 Nov;10(4):327-37 - PubMed
  22. Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):716-30 - PubMed
  23. J Med Educ. 1965 Feb;40:180-7 - PubMed
  24. Lancet. 1995 Apr 22;345(8956):1032-4 - PubMed
  25. Acad Med. 1996 Jan;71(1 Suppl):S105-7 - PubMed
  26. BMJ. 2002 Mar 23;324(7339):729-32 - PubMed
  27. Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1178-84 - PubMed
  28. Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):507-15 - PubMed
  29. Med Educ. 2011 Apr;45(4):329-38 - PubMed
  30. J Med Educ. 1961 Jan;36:73-9 - PubMed
  31. Med Teach. 2004 Jun;26(4):326-32 - PubMed
  32. BMC Med Educ. 2004 Nov 05;4:23 - PubMed
  33. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep;14 Suppl 1:37-49 - PubMed
  34. Hum Pathol. 1997 May;28(5):526-32 - PubMed
  35. Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1074-80 - PubMed
  36. Teach Learn Med. 2000 Fall;12(4):196-200 - PubMed
  37. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Summer;30(3):161-6 - PubMed
  38. Acad Med. 1995 Feb;70(2):104-10 - PubMed
  39. J Med Educ. 1973 Feb;48(2):171-7 - PubMed
  40. Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):308-13 - PubMed
  41. Med Educ. 1981 Sep;15(5):315-22 - PubMed
  42. Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1022-8 - PubMed
  43. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Oct 17;4:418 - PubMed
  44. Lancet. 2001 Mar 24;357(9260):945-9 - PubMed
  45. Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):98-106 - PubMed
  46. J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:10 - PubMed
  47. Eval Health Prof. 2004 Sep;27(3):304-19 - PubMed
  48. Med Educ. 2005 Apr;39(4):418-27 - PubMed
  49. Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):171-6 - PubMed
  50. Teach Learn Med. 2000 Fall;12(4):189-95 - PubMed
  51. Lancet. 1983 Jul 2;2(8340):34-7 - PubMed
  52. Acad Med. 2000 Feb;75(2):182-90 - PubMed
  53. Med Educ. 1985 May;19(3):238-47 - PubMed
  54. Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):570-3 - PubMed
  55. Acad Med. 1993 May;68(5):366-72 - PubMed
  56. Med Educ. 1997 Mar;31(2):115-21 - PubMed
  57. Med Teach. 2002 Sep;24(5):522-7 - PubMed
  58. BMC Med Educ. 2005 Mar 07;5(1):9 - PubMed
  59. Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):309-17 - PubMed

Publication Types