Display options
Share it on

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 17;112(46):14384-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511804112. Epub 2015 Oct 05.

Allowing variance may enlarge the safe operating space for exploited ecosystems.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Stephen R Carpenter, William A Brock, Carl Folke, Egbert H van Nes, Marten Scheffer

Affiliations

  1. Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; [email protected].
  2. Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211;
  3. Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE104 05 Stockholm, Sweden;
  4. Department of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

PMID: 26438857 PMCID: PMC4655523 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511804112

Abstract

Variable flows of food, water, or other ecosystem services complicate planning. Management strategies that decrease variability and increase predictability may therefore be preferred. However, actions to decrease variance over short timescales (2-4 y), when applied continuously, may lead to long-term ecosystem changes with adverse consequences. We investigated the effects of managing short-term variance in three well-understood models of ecosystem services: lake eutrophication, harvest of a wild population, and yield of domestic herbivores on a rangeland. In all cases, actions to decrease variance can increase the risk of crossing critical ecosystem thresholds, resulting in less desirable ecosystem states. Managing to decrease short-term variance creates ecosystem fragility by changing the boundaries of safe operating spaces, suppressing information needed for adaptive management, cancelling signals of declining resilience, and removing pressures that may build tolerance of stress. Thus, the management of variance interacts strongly and inseparably with the management of resilience. By allowing for variation, learning, and flexibility while observing change, managers can detect opportunities and problems as they develop while sustaining the capacity to deal with them.

Keywords: adaptive management; critical transition; ecosystem; resilience; variance

References

  1. Nature. 2009 Sep 3;461(7260):53-9 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15194-9 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2015 Mar 20;347(6228):1317-9 - PubMed
  4. Am Nat. 2011 Oct;178(4):E85-95 - PubMed
  5. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:399-419 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):230-2 - PubMed
  7. Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855 - PubMed
  8. Science. 1984 Jun 1;224(4652):985-7 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15206-11 - PubMed
  10. Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):407-9 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):58-62 - PubMed
  12. Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):719 - PubMed
  13. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e392 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):232-5 - PubMed
  15. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111614 - PubMed
  16. Ecol Lett. 2006 Mar;9(3):311-8 - PubMed
  17. Science. 2012 Oct 19;338(6105):344-8 - PubMed
  18. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 May;88(2):349-64 - PubMed
  19. Curr Anthropol. 2013 Apr;54(2):114-143 - PubMed
  20. Nature. 2011 Sep 1;477(7362):86-9 - PubMed
  21. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Aug;26(8):398-404 - PubMed
  22. Science. 2015 Feb 27;347(6225):953-4 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20690-5 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10002-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types