Display options
Share it on

Front Microbiol. 2015 Sep 10;6:917. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00917. eCollection 2015.

Prevalence and distribution of soil-borne zoonotic pathogens in Lahore district of Pakistan.

Frontiers in microbiology

Muhammad Z Shabbir, Tariq Jamil, Asad A Ali, Arfan Ahmad, Muhammad Naeem, Muhammad H Chaudhary, Muhammad Bilal, Muhammad A Ali, Khushi Muhammad, Tahir Yaqub, Asghari Bano, Ali I Mirza, Muhammad A B Shabbir, Walter R McVey, Ketan Patel, Stephen Francesconi, Bhushan M Jayarao, Masood Rabbani

Affiliations

  1. University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore, Pakistan.
  2. Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  3. University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan.
  4. Government College University Lahore, Pakistan.
  5. Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, USA.
  6. Naval Medical Research Unit Frederick, MA, USA.

PMID: 26441860 PMCID: PMC4564694 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00917

Abstract

A multidisciplinary, collaborative project was conducted to determine the prevalence and distribution of soil-borne zoonotic pathogens in Lahore district of Pakistan and ascertain its Public Health Significance. Using a grid-based sampling strategy, soil samples (n = 145) were collected from villages (n = 29, 5 samples/village) and examined for Bacillus anthracis, Burkholderia mallei/pseudomallei, Coxiella burnetii, Francisella tularensis, and Yersinia pestis using real time PCR assays. Chemical analysis of soil samples was also performed on these samples. The relationship between soil composition and absence or presence of the pathogen, and seven risk factors was evaluated. DNA of B. anthracis (CapB), B. mallei/pseudomallei (chromosomal gene), C. burnetii (IS1111, transposase gene), and F. tularensis (lipoprotein/outer membrane protein) was detected in 9.6, 1.4, 4.8, and 13.1% of soil samples, respectively. None of the samples were positive for protective antigen plasmid (PA) of B. anthracis and Y. pestis (plasminogen activating factor, pPla gene). The prevalence of B. anthracis (CapB) was found to be associated with organic matter, magnesium (Mg), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), cadmium (Cd), sodium (Na), ferrous (Fe), calcium (Ca), and potassium (K). Phosphorous (P) was found to be associated with prevalence of F. tularensis while it were Mg, Co, Na, Fe, Ca, and K for C. burnetii. The odds of detecting DNA of F. tularensis were 2.7, 4.1, and 2.7 higher when soil sample sites were >1 km from animal markets, >500 m from vehicular traffic roads and animal density of < 1000 animals, respectively. While the odds of detecting DNA of C. burnetii was 32, 11.8, and 5.9 higher when soil sample sites were >500 m from vehicular traffic roads, presence of ground cover and animal density of < 1000 animals, respectively. In conclusion, the distribution pattern of the soil-borne pathogens in and around the areas of Lahore district puts both human and animal populations at a high risk of exposure. Further studies are needed to explore the genetic nature and molecular diversity of prevailing pathogens together with their seroconversion in animals and humans.

Keywords: Bacillus anthracis; Burkholderia mallei/pseudomallei; Coxiella burnetii; Francisella tularensis; Yersinia pestis; risk factors; soil chemistry

References

  1. J Med Microbiol. 2008 Aug;57(Pt 8):921-30 - PubMed
  2. Mol Aspects Med. 2009 Dec;30(6):356-67 - PubMed
  3. Infect Immun. 2009 Oct;77(10):4429-36 - PubMed
  4. J Bacteriol. 1970 Mar;101(3):827-35 - PubMed
  5. Can Vet J. 2010 Sep;51(9):973-8 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):551-3 - PubMed
  7. Infect Immun. 1996 Dec;64(12):4928-32 - PubMed
  8. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Apr 10;8(4):e2787 - PubMed
  9. Mol Aspects Med. 2009 Dec;30(6):386-96 - PubMed
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 1;49(5):736-42 - PubMed
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Jul;76(13):4469-75 - PubMed
  12. Microbiology. 2008 Sep;154(Pt 9):2865-71 - PubMed
  13. Infect Immun. 2006 Jul;74(7):4224-36 - PubMed
  14. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 May;16(5):789-96 - PubMed
  15. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Dec;15(12):2036-9 - PubMed
  16. EMBO J. 2002 Dec 16;21(24):6721-32 - PubMed
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Mar;79(5):1697-703 - PubMed
  18. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;77(20):7405-7 - PubMed
  19. Mol Microbiol. 2011 Nov;82(3):634-47 - PubMed
  20. Can Vet J. 1995 May;36(5):295-301 - PubMed
  21. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014 Mar;61(2):105-12 - PubMed
  22. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013 Jun;60(3):204-21 - PubMed
  23. Environ Microbiol. 2003 Sep;5(9):719-29 - PubMed
  24. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jan;10(1):35-66 - PubMed
  25. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6 Pt A):609-16 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2001 Jun 6;285(21):2763-73 - PubMed
  27. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Jun;1105:1-29 - PubMed
  28. Clin Chem. 2006 Jan;52(1):141-5 - PubMed
  29. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 29;5(1):e8966 - PubMed
  30. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2005 Dec;112(12):470-2 - PubMed

Publication Types