Display options
Share it on

J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014 Jul-Sep;4(3):54-73.

ROLE OF MICROPERC IN MINIMAL INVASIVE EXTRACTION OF Renal STONES IN CHILDREN.

Journal of the West African College of Surgeons

A A Nasir, S K Mishra, A Ahmadi, V Murali, V B Kori, V B Kori, R B Sabnis, M R Desai

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin/University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.

PMID: 26457266 PMCID: PMC4553235

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microperc using all-seeing needle is associated with reduced tract-related morbidity.

AIM & OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of microperc in children.

PATIENTS & METHODS: From July 2010 to August 2014, a total of 17 children with renal stones underwent microperc at Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India. Renal access was achieved through 4.85-Fr (16 gauge) all-seeing needle (PolyDiagnost, Pfaffenhofen, Germany). and fragmentation with 200 µm holmium:YAG laser fiber. The patient's demographic data, clinical features, operating time, hemoglobin drop, stone clearance, complications (Clavien-Dindo), and length of hospital stay were prospectively studied.

RESULTS: A total of 17 patients with a median age of 9 years were studied. The stone size ranged from 5.3mm to 24.9mm. The median operative time was 40 minutes. The median decrease in haemoglobin was 1.2 mg/dl. The stone-free rate at first postoperative day and at the first month after the procedure were 82.4% and 88.2% respectively. The mean hospital stay was 56.4 hours. None of the patients required blood transfusion. An overall success rate of 94.1% was achieved at median follow-up of 4 months. Comparing small size stones (< 1cm) and moderate size stone (1-3cm); the immediate clearance rates were 100% and 75% respectively (p=0.331). There was no statistically significant difference in the operating time (40 vs 43mins; p=0.592), haemoglobin drop (0.85 vs 1.25 g/dl; p=0.595) and the length of hospital stay. One patient in each group had conversion to miniperc to remove residual stone fragment. There was one minor intra-operative pelvic perforation (Clavien II). There were two postoperative complications in patients with moderate stone; one of the patients had right lower lobar pneumonia and the other had colic pain and both cases were managed conservatively (Clavien I).

CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that microperc is a safe and effective procedure in the extraction of small to medium size renal stones in children.

References

  1. BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):896-9; discussion 899-900 - PubMed
  2. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jul;48(7):1578-83 - PubMed
  3. J Endourol. 2012 Nov;26(11):1443-7 - PubMed
  4. Indian J Urol. 2010 Oct;26(4):549-54 - PubMed
  5. J Endourol. 2013 Jan;27(1):13-8 - PubMed
  6. J Endourol. 2013 Feb;27(2):177-81 - PubMed
  7. Urologe A. 2013 Aug;52(8):1084-91 - PubMed
  8. J Endourol. 2013 Sep;27(9):1141-6 - PubMed
  9. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Aug;6(8):2062-8 - PubMed
  10. Adv Urol. 2011;2011:123606 - PubMed
  11. J Urol. 2008 Dec;180(6):2616-9; discussion 2619 - PubMed
  12. J Endourol. 2011 Feb;25(2):327-33 - PubMed
  13. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2405-8 - PubMed
  14. World J Urol. 2004 Oct;22(4):277-80 - PubMed
  15. J Endourol. 2008 Apr;22(4):637-40 - PubMed
  16. J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):933-9 - PubMed
  17. J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):680-3; discussion 683 - PubMed
  18. J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):11-7 - PubMed
  19. J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Oct;5(5):351-4 - PubMed
  20. J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1166-7 - PubMed
  21. BJU Int. 2005 Mar;95(4):631-4 - PubMed
  22. Indian J Urol. 2013 Jul;29(3):214-8 - PubMed
  23. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1419-24 - PubMed
  24. J Endourol. 2002 Mar;16(2):75-8 - PubMed
  25. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD007044 - PubMed
  26. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2164-6 - PubMed
  27. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):140-5 - PubMed

Publication Types